2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-018-1206-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex/Gender/Sexual Science Research 24/7

Abstract: Since my last Editorial (Zucker, 2016), it feels that the Journal has ramped up in terms of "busyness." When I became Editor in 2002, we had 80 new submissions. There has been, more or less, a linear increase since then, hitting a milestone of sorts in 2017, when we surpassed 500 new submissions for the first time (Fig. 1). I don't think that this temporal pattern is unique to Archives: Its fraternal opposite-sex twin,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2019, the percentage of "rejected" manuscripts was 53.3%, "major revision" was 38.7%, and "provisional accept" was 7.8%. These figures remain fairly consistent with prior years (e.g., Zucker, 2018Zucker, , 2020. For contributing authors, it is important to note that when manuscripts are given the designation of a Major Revision, the vast majority (of those that are resubmitted) are accepted for publication.…”
Section: Manuscript Disposition (2019)supporting
confidence: 73%
“…In 2019, the percentage of "rejected" manuscripts was 53.3%, "major revision" was 38.7%, and "provisional accept" was 7.8%. These figures remain fairly consistent with prior years (e.g., Zucker, 2018Zucker, , 2020. For contributing authors, it is important to note that when manuscripts are given the designation of a Major Revision, the vast majority (of those that are resubmitted) are accepted for publication.…”
Section: Manuscript Disposition (2019)supporting
confidence: 73%