To cite this article: Raps M, Rosendaal F, Ballieux B, Rosing J, Thomassen S, Helmerhorst F, van Vliet H. Resistance to APC and SHBG levels during use of a four-phasic oral contraceptive containing dienogest and estradiol valerate: a randomized controlled trial. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11: 855-61.Summary. Background: The use of combined oral contraceptives is associated with a 3-to 6-fold increased risk of venous thrombosis. This increased risk depends on the estrogen dose as well as the progestogen type of combined oral contraceptives. Thrombin generation-based activated protein C resistance (APC resistance) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels predict the thrombotic risk of a combined hormonal contraceptive. Recently, a four-phasic oral contraceptive containing dienogest (DNG) and estradiol valerate (E2V) has been marketed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the thrombotic risk of the DNG/E2V oral contraceptive by comparing APC resistance by measuring normalized APC sensitivity ratios (nAPCsr) and SHBG levels in users of oral contraceptives containing dienogest and estradiol valerate (DNG/E2V) and oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol (LNG/EE). Methods: We conducted a single-center, randomized, open label, parallel-group study in 74 women using DNG/E2V or LNG/ EE, and measured nAPCsr and SHBG levels in every phase of the regimen of DNG/E2V. Results: During the pill cycle SHBG levels did not differ between DNG/E2V users and LNG/EE users. nAPCsr levels were overall slightly lower in DNG/E2V users than in LNG/EE users, mean difference À0.44 (95% CI, À1.04 to 0.17) for day 2, À0.20 (95% CI, À0.76 to 0.37) for day 7, À0.27 (95% CI, À0.81 to 0.28) for day 24 and À0.34 (95% CI, À0.91 to 0.24) for day 26. Conclusion: No statistical significant differences in nAPCsr and SHBG levels were found between users of the oral contraceptive containing DNG/E2V and LNG/EE, suggesting a comparable thrombotic risk Keywords: activated protein C resistance, natural estrogen, oral contraceptives, sex hormone binding globulin, thrombotic risk.
IntroductionUse of combined oral contraceptives is associated with a 3-to 6-fold increased risk of venous thrombosis. This increased risk depends on the estrogen dose as well as the progestogen-type of combined oral contraceptives [1]. Socalled 'high-dose' combined oral contraceptives containing 50 lg or more ethinyl estradiol (EE) are associated with a 2-fold higher risk of thrombosis than 'low-dose' combined oral contraceptives containing 20-30 lg EE [2,3]. Furthermore, combined oral contraceptives containing the progestogens gestodene (GTD), desogestrel (DSG), cyproterone acetate (CPA) or drospirenone (DRSP) increase the risk of venous thrombosis by a factor two compared with combined oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel (LNG) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].The differences in the risk of venous thrombosis can at least partially be explained by the different effects of various combined oral contraceptives on the resistance to activated protein...