2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex hormones and arrhythmia in myocardial ischemia

Abstract: The mechanisms by which gender affects cardiac electrophysiological parameters and alters the predisposition to certain arrhythmias are not well understood, although differences in the expression and function of ion channels and in the activation of the autonomic nervous system may contribute. In their study Philp and coworkers address the issue of the effect of 17b-estradiol on ventricular vulnerability in a rat model of ischemia. Their data show that there is a dose-dependent antiarrhythmic activity of 17b-e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no significant difference in the rate of myocardial infarction between groups B1 and B2 ( p =0.169, OR=2.889, 95% CI=0.618–13.496), whereas the morbidity rates for ischemic stroke between groups B1 and A1 showed a weak trend toward a significant difference ( p =0.060, OR=3.682, 95% CI=0.911–14.876), suggesting that the synergistic effect of CoAS and CeAS might increase the risk of ischemic stroke but not myocardial infarction. The reason might be associated with the cardiogenic etiologies of myocardial ischemia, such as arrhythmia, cardiogenic embolism, and decreased cardiac function [ 23 25 ]. Because the different therapeutic strategies after angiography, such as angioplasty, bypass surgery and drug treatment, might interfere with the synergistic effect of CoAS and CeAS [ 26 – 28 ], this study retrospectively analyzed the morbidity rates for myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke before angiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no significant difference in the rate of myocardial infarction between groups B1 and B2 ( p =0.169, OR=2.889, 95% CI=0.618–13.496), whereas the morbidity rates for ischemic stroke between groups B1 and A1 showed a weak trend toward a significant difference ( p =0.060, OR=3.682, 95% CI=0.911–14.876), suggesting that the synergistic effect of CoAS and CeAS might increase the risk of ischemic stroke but not myocardial infarction. The reason might be associated with the cardiogenic etiologies of myocardial ischemia, such as arrhythmia, cardiogenic embolism, and decreased cardiac function [ 23 25 ]. Because the different therapeutic strategies after angiography, such as angioplasty, bypass surgery and drug treatment, might interfere with the synergistic effect of CoAS and CeAS [ 26 – 28 ], this study retrospectively analyzed the morbidity rates for myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke before angiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%