“…formula) that reached 65% followed by FM width (63.5%) and FM length (63%), while in Abo El-Atta et al's study, the accuracy of FM width and FM length were 64.5% and 59.5% respectively. 22,23 However, Lopez et al values for discriminant function analysis were lower than the current study, prediction values were arranged from highest to the lowest as; Area2 (59.6%), Area1 (57.4%), FM length (51.1%) and the least was the FM width (44.7%). On the contrary, in Uthman et al study on the Iraqi population, the prediction value of FM Area was 69.3% which is higher than our study.…”