2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0007087418000481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex in the laboratory: the Family Planning Association and contraceptive science in Britain, 1929–1959

Abstract: Scientific and medical contraceptive standards are commonly believed to have begun with the advent of the oral contraceptive pill in the late 1950s. This article explains that in Britain contraceptive standards were imagined and implemented at least two decades earlier by the Family Planning Association, which sought to legitimize contraceptive methods, practice and provision through the foundation of the field of contraceptive science. This article charts the origins of the field, investigating the three meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, it supported the work of the Oxford zoologist and eugenicist John Baker on the spermicidal effectiveness of a variety of chemicals. 78 Recent work concentrating on the BCIC has highlighted the prominent role of male scientists in the development and testing of chemical contraception, and in the short-lived distinction the BCIC drew between pure science (the knowledge produced in the laboratory) and applied research (the research confined within clinic and separated from the laboratory) 79 . The book shows that women doctors blurred this distinction between pure and applied research since they liaised between laboratory and patients' needs and conducted clinical trials within birth control clinics.…”
Section: Contraceptive Culture and The Production Of Medical Knowledgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it supported the work of the Oxford zoologist and eugenicist John Baker on the spermicidal effectiveness of a variety of chemicals. 78 Recent work concentrating on the BCIC has highlighted the prominent role of male scientists in the development and testing of chemical contraception, and in the short-lived distinction the BCIC drew between pure science (the knowledge produced in the laboratory) and applied research (the research confined within clinic and separated from the laboratory) 79 . The book shows that women doctors blurred this distinction between pure and applied research since they liaised between laboratory and patients' needs and conducted clinical trials within birth control clinics.…”
Section: Contraceptive Culture and The Production Of Medical Knowledgmentioning
confidence: 99%