2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20161-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex in the School: Adolescent Sexuality, Sexual Space and Sex Education in Marzipan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rather numerous sexual education and sexual psychology materials published in the state-socialist era also proclaimed gender equality, refused the sexual double standard, and thematized the issue of homosexuality as well, but the attitudes expressed were ultimately heteronormative (Rédai, 2013). The primary goal of sex education was to prepare youth for heteronormative family life and reproduction: “ Normal sexuality means attraction towards those of the opposite sex , and in the case of healthy, cultivated people it is interlaced with emotional and ethical elements” (Haraszti & Székely, 1965, p. 25; emphasis in original).…”
Section: (Homo)sexuality and State Socialism In Hungarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The rather numerous sexual education and sexual psychology materials published in the state-socialist era also proclaimed gender equality, refused the sexual double standard, and thematized the issue of homosexuality as well, but the attitudes expressed were ultimately heteronormative (Rédai, 2013). The primary goal of sex education was to prepare youth for heteronormative family life and reproduction: “ Normal sexuality means attraction towards those of the opposite sex , and in the case of healthy, cultivated people it is interlaced with emotional and ethical elements” (Haraszti & Székely, 1965, p. 25; emphasis in original).…”
Section: (Homo)sexuality and State Socialism In Hungarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Deviant” behavior had to be controlled (mostly through the experts of medicine or psy sciences) because alternative sexualities and lifestyles threatened the system of family and society, so they were not private issues anymore. People with “pathological” sexualities did not conform to the principles of socialist ethics; therefore, they could not be good sexual citizens (Rédai, 2013). In a smaller number, models of (and discourses on) open relationships appeared too—the commune ideal of the early 1970s (Heller, 1970; Heller & Vajda, 1970) and the issue of extramarital sexuality and “open marriage” (Szilágyi, 1980).…”
Section: (Homo)sexuality and State Socialism In Hungarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation