2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04969-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex judgment using color fundus parameters in elementary school students

Abstract: Purposes Recently, artificial intelligence has been used to determine sex using fundus photographs alone. We had earlier reported that sex can be distinguished using known factors obtained from color fundus photography (CFP) in adult eyes. However, it is not clear when the sex difference in fundus parameters begins. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate sex determination based on fundus parameters using binominal logistic regression in elementary school students. Methods This prospective observatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed in Visual explanations for DOVS-ii classifiers that mean GGCAM behaviour for a matching class label ( e.g .,“Female” image, “Female” class label) tends to have activation in image regions that have physiologically salient components ( e.g ., vasculature and/or optic disk), some of which have previously been identified as potentially relevant markers for sex determination from fundus images [ 32 ]. Moreover, in contrast, mean GGCAM activation for an opposite class label ( e.g ., “Female” image, “Male” class label) tends not to have activation in physiologically salient image regions ( e.g ., at the border of the background image and the fundus).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed in Visual explanations for DOVS-ii classifiers that mean GGCAM behaviour for a matching class label ( e.g .,“Female” image, “Female” class label) tends to have activation in image regions that have physiologically salient components ( e.g ., vasculature and/or optic disk), some of which have previously been identified as potentially relevant markers for sex determination from fundus images [ 32 ]. Moreover, in contrast, mean GGCAM activation for an opposite class label ( e.g ., “Female” image, “Male” class label) tends not to have activation in physiologically salient image regions ( e.g ., at the border of the background image and the fundus).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the difference between the sexes in the temperature at the mid-vitreous was not determined. Sex differences in the location of the retinal vessels have been reported [ 17 ], and the heat retention effect of blood circulation may be different, but further research on the sex differences in the intraocular temperatures is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was part of a longitudinal, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study of third grade students who were 8–9 years old at the first examination [ 23 , 34 ]. The students attended the Elementary School of the Faculty of Education of Kagoshima University.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these measurements were conducted using CFP images and the ImageJ software (ImageJ version 1.47, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; available at: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ ). The macro function of ImageJ enabled semiautomated calculation of the above-described CFP parameters; all the 54 parameters were automatically calculated when the locations of the fovea, center of the optic nerve head, and crossing points of supralateral or inferolateral RA or RV were decided [ 34 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation