2019
DOI: 10.1655/d-18-00035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex, Mass, and Monitoring Effort: Keys to Understanding Spatial Ecology of Timber Rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intrinsic factors, such as sex and motivational state, have pronounced effects on the movement patterns of pit vipers (Waldron et al, 2006;DeSantis et al, 2019;Emerson et al, 2022) and therefore are a key consideration when investigating the influence of roadways on C. horridus movement. For pit vipers, elevated male movement is thought to be the primary determinant of mate location and success, and this is thought to drive significant increases in movement and space use by males during the mating season (Waldron et al, 2006;Petersen et al, 2019). Given this male-search based mating system and observations made by previous authors on C. horridus elsewhere in their distribution, we expected males to generally display elevated measures of movement and space use relative to females (both within seasons and when data are pooled across seasons).…”
Section: Effect Of Roads On Annual Rt and Act Movement Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intrinsic factors, such as sex and motivational state, have pronounced effects on the movement patterns of pit vipers (Waldron et al, 2006;DeSantis et al, 2019;Emerson et al, 2022) and therefore are a key consideration when investigating the influence of roadways on C. horridus movement. For pit vipers, elevated male movement is thought to be the primary determinant of mate location and success, and this is thought to drive significant increases in movement and space use by males during the mating season (Waldron et al, 2006;Petersen et al, 2019). Given this male-search based mating system and observations made by previous authors on C. horridus elsewhere in their distribution, we expected males to generally display elevated measures of movement and space use relative to females (both within seasons and when data are pooled across seasons).…”
Section: Effect Of Roads On Annual Rt and Act Movement Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, numerous intrinsic and extrinsic factors simultaneously influence movement decisions, making it difficult to pinpoint the mechanistic roles of each individual driver. Among these, an individual's sex, age, and motivational state (e.g., behavioral season) have all been demonstrated to influence movement patterns, and, consequently, are important considerations when exploring the effects of individual extrinsic factors, such as roadways, on movement patterns (Waldron et al, 2006;Petersen et al, 2019). Unsurprisingly, species-specific behavioral responses to roadways can vary tremendously, ranging from avoidance (Thurber et al, 1994;Rondinini and Doncaster, 2002;Andrews et al, 2008;McGregor et al, 2008;Hibbitts et al, 2017) to strong attractance (Mumme et al, 2000;Aresco, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCP method has long been lauded as a way of maintaining comparability and historical consistency with previous studies [ 56 ], yet has well documented issues: extreme sensitivity to sampling size and tracking duration [ 57 ], and overestimated boundary delineation [ 58 ], with the inclusion of areas that the animals never use [ 59 , 60 ]. However, Row and Blouin-Demers [ 18 ] argued that MCPs are preferable to kernel density estimators specifically for herpetofauna, and MCPs’ use persists for comparisons in reptile telemetry studies [ 61 ]. An additional and considerable limitation of MCPs is that they do not create a probabilistic utilization distribution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results further showed males occupying activity ranges 1.25-3.00 ha (82.6-186.5%) larger than those of females, and moving up to 6.24 m/d (88.9%) more than females. We expected these differences, as males of C. ruber elsewhere [49] and those of other rattlesnake species (e.g., [89][90][91][92][93]; but see [94]) exhibit greater levels of activity than females. Moreover, the activity range size increased with increasing SVL for male snakes, but not for female snakes.…”
Section: Translocation Effects On the Snakementioning
confidence: 99%