The expression of a gene can vary across individuals in the general population, as well as between monozygotic twins. This variable expression is assumed to be due to the influence of both genetic and nongenetic factors. Yet little evidence supporting this assumption has been obtained from empirical data. In this study, we used expression data from a large twin cohort to investigate the influences of genetic and nongenetic factors on variable gene expression. We focused on a set of expression variability QTL (evQTL)-i.e., genetic loci associated with the variance, as opposed to the mean, of gene expression. We identified evQTL for 99, 56, and 79 genes in lymphoblastoid cell lines, skin, and fat, respectively. The differences in gene expression, measured by the relative mean difference (RMD), tended to be larger between pairs of dizygotic (DZ) twins than between pairs of monozygotic (MZ) twins, showing that genetic background influenced the expression variability. Furthermore, a more profound RMD was observed between pairs of MZ twins whose genotypes were associated with greater expression variability than the RMD found between pairs of MZ twins whose genotypes were associated with smaller expression variability. This suggests that nongenetic (e.g., environmental) factors contribute to the variable expression. Lastly, we demonstrated that the formation of evQTL is likely due to partial linkages between eQTL SNPs that are additively associated with the mean of gene expression; in most cases, no epistatic effect is involved. Our findings have implications for understanding divergent sources of gene expression variability.V ARIATION and variability are central concepts in biology (Hallgrímsson and Hall 2005). Although often used interchangeably in the scientific literature, the two are not synonymous. Variation refers to the differences among individuals, whereas variability refers to the potential of a population to vary (Wagner 1995;Wagner and Altenberg 1996). In many cases, greater phenotypic variability (e.g., transcriptional noise) is disadvantageous (Kemkemer et al. 2002;Bahar et al. 2006;Wang and Zhang 2011) unless it gives rise to greater organismal plasticity-first at the level of an individual organism and eventually at the population level. Genetic factors resulting in more variable phenotypes become favored when they enable a population to more effectively respond to environmental changes (Hill and Zhang 2004;Kaern et al. 2005;Acar et al. 2008;Zhang et al. 2009). Thus, understanding to what extent and in what ways genotypes influence phenotypic variability is of fundamental importance.Much effort has been focused on identifying genetic loci such as expression quantitative trait loci, or eQTL (Stranger et al. 2005(Stranger et al. , 2007Choy et al. 2008;Montgomery et al. 2010;Pickrell et al. 2010;Montgomery and Dermitzakis 2011), that affect the average value of a phenotype, while ignoring those that affect the variance of a phenotype. However, there is increasing evidence across species for genet...