Sex segregation in strength sports: Do equal‐sized muscles express the same levels of strength between sexes?

Abstract

Objectives: Concerns have been raised against the current two-sex binary category in sports competitions. The thesis states that if males and females were separated based on muscle size, it would negate the strength advantage between the sexes. We tested the possible sex differences in various strength outcomes when pair-matched for muscle thickness. Methods: A total of 16 different data sets (n = 963) were assessed to pairmatch females with males who had a muscle thickness value within 2%. We further compared the competition performances of the smallest male weight class within the International Powerlifting Federation (IPF) to different weight classes in females. Results: Overall, 76%-88% of the strength assessments were greater in males than females with pair-matched muscle thickness, regardless of contraction types (i.e., isotonic, isometric, isokinetic). Additionally, males in the lightest weight division in the IPF largely outperformed females in heavier weight divisions. Conclusions: Our results would suggest that segregation based on muscle mass or surrogates of muscle mass (e.g., lean body mass) might not be an appropriate classification to create fair competition within strength sports. This is not to refute the concept of the desegregation of the two-sex binary category but to present data that raises important concerns about the potential sexbased differences in strength performance.

Recommendations for the Isokinetic Test of Female’s Soccer Players Knee: A Systematic Review

“…Considering females muscle testing, it worth noting that the strength characteristics of males and females' muscle are different. Males and females with the same muscle size show different levels of strength, being females' quadriceps muscles weaker by a 12% to 24 % in comparison to male's when normalized for muscle thickness [23]. Furthermore, knee injuries rate risk is higher in females than in males due to the morphological condition of "genus valgus" [42], in fact, the prevalence of knee injuries in females is further worsened by the presence of the valgus knee, which is a common feature in the female Asian biotype [18].…”

The Isokinetic Method in Female Uninjured Female Soccer Players: A Survey of Applications and Common Mismatches

“…Considering females muscle testing, it worth noting that the strength characteristics of males and females muscle are different. Males and females with the same muscle size show different levels of strength, being females' quadriceps muscles weaker by a 12% to 24 % in comparison to male's when normalized for muscle thickness [10]. Furthermore, knee injuries rate is higher in females than in males due to the morphological condition of "genus valgus" [11], in fact, the prevalence of knee injuries in females is further worsened by the presence of the valgus knee, which is a common feature in the female Asian biotype [12].…”

Percentile Rankings And Normalization Of Performance For International Weightlifting Federation World Championships Competitors

“…;Castro et al, 1995;Heyward et al, 1986;Nimphius et al, 2019;Roberts et al, 2020;Schantz et al, 1983;Welle et al, 2008). Interestingly, in powerlifters,Kataoka et al (2023) found that men were stronger than women even after matching groups for muscle thickness, suggesting that in lifting sports (e.g., Olympic Weightlifting and Powerlifting), men may have greater strength relative to muscle mass. Although muscle mass was not quantified in the present study, greater body weight in resistance trained individuals does tend to result in greater underlying muscle mass, which may be evident in IWF competitors.…”