Patients with a dilated thoracic aorta are at risk for aortic complications such as aortic dissection or rupture. While these aortic complications result in high mortality rates, aortic dilatation often remains asymptomatic for a long period of time. Therefore, identification and treatment of individuals with a dilated aorta is of paramount importance. This is specifically relevant given that the diagnostic techniques and therapeutic options are available. Currently, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines define an aorta dilated if the diameter exceeds 40 mm. In addition, preventive surgery is indicated for aortic diameters above 55 mm for both women and men. 1 Even though thoracic aortic aneurysms are less prevalent in women as compared with men, the consequences are worse for women. Female patients with an aortic dissection have a poorer surgical outcome and die more frequently than men. Also, the growth rate of a thoracic aneurysm is greater in women as compared with men. 2 Currently, as medicine advances, personalised medicine has become emerging. The most relevant patient characteristics that have been considered relevant in medicine are age, sex and comorbidities such as diabetes. However, for aortic complications, information on subgroups is limited as data in older patients is sparse, and currently used cutoff values are based on a cohort of relatively young people. 3 In addition to lack of data on age, thoracic aortic diameters values have been determined regardless of sex. As a result, one-size fits all cut-off values are used, while the Framingham Heart Study had indicated that age and sex matter for vascular dimensions such as thoracic aortic diameter. 4 Since more attention is being paid to sex differences within arterial vascular disease, 5 it has been described that women have smaller carotid and coronary arteries 6 and have smaller abdominal aortic aneurysms as compared with men (summarised in figure 1). As smaller abdominal aortic aneurysms in women are more prone to rupture, 5 the currently used uniform threshold for dilated abdominal aortic aneurysm repair has been under debate. 7 For the coronary vasculature, smaller vessels in women have been hypothesised to be one of the underlying reasons for the higher risk of coronary complications in women undergoing coronary artery revascularisation. 6 8 In their Heart paper, Bons and colleagues report the results of the Rotterdam Study. 9 They provide us with population based, sex-specific distributions values of thoracic aortic diameters in the elderly. In addition, they identify relevant determinants for the aortic diameters in men and women. Of the 2505 participants, approximately half is female that allowed for an equally powered study in men and women. The population underwent non-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CT) to measure ascending and descending aortic diameters. As it is still undecided whether aortic diameters should be evaluated using body surface area (BSA) corrected values or absolute values, the authors assessed bo...