2004
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arg094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-specific growth rates in zebra finch nestlings: a possible mechanism for sex ratio adjustment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
75
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, effects on size were strongly sex biased, with females doing worse than males when their mothers were reared in large experimental broods. The findings are consistent with previous evidence that female nestlings are more vulnerable to nutritional stress (Bradbury & Blakey 1998;Kilner 1998;Martins 2004;Rutstein et al 2004) and show that such effects can even last into the next generation (also see Gorman & Nager 2004). Since females raised in enlarged broods produce eggs with lower testosterone levels , it may be that our present findings were mediated through this mechanism, together with a possibly differential effect of yolk androgen in male and female embryos (Gil 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, effects on size were strongly sex biased, with females doing worse than males when their mothers were reared in large experimental broods. The findings are consistent with previous evidence that female nestlings are more vulnerable to nutritional stress (Bradbury & Blakey 1998;Kilner 1998;Martins 2004;Rutstein et al 2004) and show that such effects can even last into the next generation (also see Gorman & Nager 2004). Since females raised in enlarged broods produce eggs with lower testosterone levels , it may be that our present findings were mediated through this mechanism, together with a possibly differential effect of yolk androgen in male and female embryos (Gil 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, in contrast to mammals (Huck et al 1987) and insects (Fox & Mousseau 1998), in birds the extent to which these effects of developmental stress on offspring are projected into future generations is still not known. Given that effects of nutritional stress have been shown to be sex specific, with females being affected more than males (Kilner 1998;Martins 2004), we were also interested in determining whether these sex-specific effects would project into the next generation. Here we report a two-step breeding experiment in which we followed effects of brood size manipulation over two generations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogametic sex (XY males in mammals; ZW females in birds) is thought to always be at a disadvantage, because they are susceptible to the expression of sex-linked deleterious recessive alleles. This hypothesis might explain why daughters in this study, and in the related and monomorphic zebra finch [34,35,50], are more vulnerable than sons to malnutrition during early development. Theoretically, heterogameity would predispose daughters to greater mortality and reduced performance during development [1,2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, the great variation in the pattern of development in birds along the altricial-precocial spectrum means that hatching takes place at different stages of maturation, adding a further layer of complexity to the effects of the early developmental environment that has received little attention. A number of field and laboratory studies in birds suggest that one sex is more vulnerable to poor early environmental conditions than the other (Nager et al 1999;Martins 2004;Spencer & Verhulst 2007). We need also to consider therefore whether we get differing fitness outcomes for males and females.…”
Section: Review Growth Phenotype and Environment P Monaghan 1639mentioning
confidence: 99%