2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-specific markers developed by next-generation sequencing confirmed a male heterogametic sex determination in small abalone, Haliotis diversicolor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a wholegenome resequencing (WGRS-seq) study of Gadus morhua, a total of 227 samples were used with sequencing at a depth of ~10.9 × [48]. Another disadvantage of WGRS-seq is the dependency on the reference genome of the sequenced species [49,50]; meanwhile, reduced-representation genome sequencing (RRGS-seq), including RAD-seq, ddRAD-seq, and 2bRAD-seq, shares the same shortcoming [21,51,52]. Additionally, the sex-specific sequences obtained from RRGS-seq are too few and too short [44], which is attributed to the restriction of enzyme sites, resulting in the difficulties in their detection using simple methods (PCR amplification and electrophoresis) and the risk of loss of more sex-specific sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a wholegenome resequencing (WGRS-seq) study of Gadus morhua, a total of 227 samples were used with sequencing at a depth of ~10.9 × [48]. Another disadvantage of WGRS-seq is the dependency on the reference genome of the sequenced species [49,50]; meanwhile, reduced-representation genome sequencing (RRGS-seq), including RAD-seq, ddRAD-seq, and 2bRAD-seq, shares the same shortcoming [21,51,52]. Additionally, the sex-specific sequences obtained from RRGS-seq are too few and too short [44], which is attributed to the restriction of enzyme sites, resulting in the difficulties in their detection using simple methods (PCR amplification and electrophoresis) and the risk of loss of more sex-specific sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, based on many molecular biology techniques, such as Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), Restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq), genomic sequencing and re-sequencing, transcriptome sequencing, etc., the genetic factors of sex determination have been studied in greater detail. Up to now, not only have many sex-related markers, sex-related genes and pathways and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for sex been identified [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], but some novel insights into the sex-determination mechanism in mollusks were provided. For example, the research conducted by Yue et al [ 20 ] based on the RAD-seq showed no evidence for sex chromosomes or single-locus models for Crassostrea gigas primary sex determination, and they proposed a sex-determination hypothesis involving multiple genetic factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%