1990
DOI: 10.1300/j056v02n02_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-Typed Body Movements as a Function of Severity of Gender Disturbance in Boys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, demonstration of discriminant validity regarding many of the putative characteristics of children, mainly boys, with gender identity disorder has been fairly straightforward. Structured parent interviews regarding specific sex-typed behaviours (Green, 1987;Roberts, Green, Williams & Goodman, 1987), parent-report on sex-typed play and behaviour questionniares Bates, Bentler & Thompson, 1973;Green, 1976Green, , 1987Zucker, Bradley, Corter, Doering »& Finegan, 1980;Zucker, Bradley, Doering & Lozinski, 1985), measurement of overt (Doering, Zucker, Bradley & Maclntyre, 1989;Green, Fuller, Rutley & Hendler, 1972;Rekers & Yates, 1976; and covert (Green & Fuller, 1973;Zucker, Doering, Bradley, Alon & Lozinski, 1984) sex-typed play in standardized situations, observation of sex-typed motoric behaviour (Bates, Bentler & Thompson, 1979;Green, Neuberg & Finch, 1983), assessment of gender constancy development (Zucker et ai, 1988), and sextyped indices on projective tests, including the Draw-a-Person (Green, Fuller & Rutley, 1972;Skilbcck, Bates & Bentler, 1975;Zucker, Finegan, Doering & Bradley, 1983), the IT Scale for Ghildren (Green et ai , 1972), and the Rorschach (Zucker, Lozinski, Bradley & Doering, 1992) have all yielded differences between gender-referred probands and comparison groups, which have included sibling, psychiatric and normal controls (see also Rekers & Morey, 1989a, 1989bRekers, Rosen & Morey, 1990).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, demonstration of discriminant validity regarding many of the putative characteristics of children, mainly boys, with gender identity disorder has been fairly straightforward. Structured parent interviews regarding specific sex-typed behaviours (Green, 1987;Roberts, Green, Williams & Goodman, 1987), parent-report on sex-typed play and behaviour questionniares Bates, Bentler & Thompson, 1973;Green, 1976Green, , 1987Zucker, Bradley, Corter, Doering »& Finegan, 1980;Zucker, Bradley, Doering & Lozinski, 1985), measurement of overt (Doering, Zucker, Bradley & Maclntyre, 1989;Green, Fuller, Rutley & Hendler, 1972;Rekers & Yates, 1976; and covert (Green & Fuller, 1973;Zucker, Doering, Bradley, Alon & Lozinski, 1984) sex-typed play in standardized situations, observation of sex-typed motoric behaviour (Bates, Bentler & Thompson, 1979;Green, Neuberg & Finch, 1983), assessment of gender constancy development (Zucker et ai, 1988), and sextyped indices on projective tests, including the Draw-a-Person (Green, Fuller & Rutley, 1972;Skilbcck, Bates & Bentler, 1975;Zucker, Finegan, Doering & Bradley, 1983), the IT Scale for Ghildren (Green et ai , 1972), and the Rorschach (Zucker, Lozinski, Bradley & Doering, 1992) have all yielded differences between gender-referred probands and comparison groups, which have included sibling, psychiatric and normal controls (see also Rekers & Morey, 1989a, 1989bRekers, Rosen & Morey, 1990).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%