1991
DOI: 10.2307/1122847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex(ual Orientation) and Title VII

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful Title VII claims involving sexual orientation discrimination or same-sex harassment have argued gender rather than sexual orientation discrimination (e.g., Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 1989). DeSantis v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (1979 stated that "Title VII should not be judicially extended to include sexual preference such as homosexuality" (Capers, 1991). Since 1994, Congress has failed to pass federal legislation to prohibit sexual orientation discrimination; courts cannot enforce nonexisting law.…”
Section: Title VII Of the Civil Rights Act Of 1964mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful Title VII claims involving sexual orientation discrimination or same-sex harassment have argued gender rather than sexual orientation discrimination (e.g., Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 1989). DeSantis v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (1979 stated that "Title VII should not be judicially extended to include sexual preference such as homosexuality" (Capers, 1991). Since 1994, Congress has failed to pass federal legislation to prohibit sexual orientation discrimination; courts cannot enforce nonexisting law.…”
Section: Title VII Of the Civil Rights Act Of 1964mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 As Stuart Hall notes, "the disruption of the normal functioning of the old economic, social, and cultural order, provides the opportunity to reorganize it in new ways, to restructure and refashion, to modernize and move ahead." 6 In this spirit, we shall focus on exploring the ways in which technology could have a positive impact in democratizing legal knowledge and power, while acknowledging that, as Bonilla points out, a powerful negative potential exists in terms of inferior education and increased inequality. For purposes of this article, we do not address other issues that Bonilla raises, including whether "law schools must innovate in technical matters to meet the expectations and needs of the new generations of law students" or whether "this aim should be achieved to meet the expectations and needs of law firms."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%