Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The mistrust of AI seen in the media, industry and education reflects deep-seated cultural anxieties, often comparable to societal prejudices like racism and sexism. Throughout history, literature and media have portrayed machines as antagonists, amplifying fears of technological obsolescence and identity loss. Despite the recent remarkable advancements in AI—particularly in creative and decision-making capacities—human resistance to its adoption persists, rooted in a combination of technophobia, algorithm aversion, and cultural narratives of dystopia. This review investigates the origins of this prejudice, focusing on the parallels between current attitudes toward AI and historical resistance to new technologies. Drawing on examples from popular media and recent research, the article reveals how AI, despite outperforming humans in some creative tasks, is often undervalued due to bias. The evidence shows that the tool can significantly augment human creativity and productivity, yet these benefits are frequently undermined by persistent skepticism. The article argues that this prejudice represents a critical barrier to the full realization of the potential of the generative technology and calls for a reexamination of human-AI collaboration, emphasizing the importance of addressing these biases both culturally and within educational and professional frameworks.
The mistrust of AI seen in the media, industry and education reflects deep-seated cultural anxieties, often comparable to societal prejudices like racism and sexism. Throughout history, literature and media have portrayed machines as antagonists, amplifying fears of technological obsolescence and identity loss. Despite the recent remarkable advancements in AI—particularly in creative and decision-making capacities—human resistance to its adoption persists, rooted in a combination of technophobia, algorithm aversion, and cultural narratives of dystopia. This review investigates the origins of this prejudice, focusing on the parallels between current attitudes toward AI and historical resistance to new technologies. Drawing on examples from popular media and recent research, the article reveals how AI, despite outperforming humans in some creative tasks, is often undervalued due to bias. The evidence shows that the tool can significantly augment human creativity and productivity, yet these benefits are frequently undermined by persistent skepticism. The article argues that this prejudice represents a critical barrier to the full realization of the potential of the generative technology and calls for a reexamination of human-AI collaboration, emphasizing the importance of addressing these biases both culturally and within educational and professional frameworks.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.