2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual cannibalism and mate choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Minors of other species influence the outcome of sperm competitions by means of producing sperm that swims faster or contains more energy (Locatello et al 2007). Males in some male-monomorphic species are known to invest into agents that increase their mate's fecundity, for instance nuptial gifts, which are compounds beneficial to the female through their nutritional value such as glandular products (Vahed 1998) prey, (part of) the male body (Eggert and Sakaluk 1994;Prenter et al 2006) or seminal gifts (Bownes and Partridge 1987;Markow et al 1990;Eisner et al 1996;Edvardsson 2007;Gwynne 2008). However, whether or not minor males invest into nuptial gifts to increase their mate's reproductive success is, to our knowledge, unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minors of other species influence the outcome of sperm competitions by means of producing sperm that swims faster or contains more energy (Locatello et al 2007). Males in some male-monomorphic species are known to invest into agents that increase their mate's fecundity, for instance nuptial gifts, which are compounds beneficial to the female through their nutritional value such as glandular products (Vahed 1998) prey, (part of) the male body (Eggert and Sakaluk 1994;Prenter et al 2006) or seminal gifts (Bownes and Partridge 1987;Markow et al 1990;Eisner et al 1996;Edvardsson 2007;Gwynne 2008). However, whether or not minor males invest into nuptial gifts to increase their mate's reproductive success is, to our knowledge, unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precopulatory sexual cannibalism can be a risky behavior, especially for virgin females, since they may remain unmated because of their actions, assuming no additional suitors are encountered (Arnqvist & Henriksson, 1997;Elgar, 1992). However, precopulatory sexual cannibalism may become more likely if males are perceived to be more abundant and if females use cannibalism as a mechanism of mate choice, selectively cannibalizing nonpreferred mates (Darwin, 1871;Elgar, 1992;Elgar & Nash, 1988;Elgar & Schneider, 2004;Hebets, 2003;Johnson, 2005;Prenter, MacNeil, & Elwood, 2006). Given the significant increase in the frequency of precopulatory sexual cannibalism after females had encountered two males (68% cannibalized the third male prior to copulation, experiment 1), D. tenebrosus females may be using precopulatory sexual cannibalism as a means of rejecting additional mates, whether or not the males are preferred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, there is an inverse relationship between the courtship duration of the first male to mate and the number of copulations the female accepts from a rival (Snow & Andrade 2005;Snow et al 2006;Stoltz et al 2009). Second, females often kill and cannibalize smaller, rapidly copulating males prior to completion of a normal mating (premature lethal cannibalism; Stoltz et al 2008), which reduces paternity by 50 per cent under sperm competition (Snow & Andrade 2005; see also Prenter et al 2006). In contrast, larger, longer-courting males mate normally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, larger, longer-courting males mate normally. Thus, female choice is apparently linked to courtship effort as well as male size (Stoltz et al , 2009; see also Prenter et al 2006), and selection imposed by females may have resulted in males that attempt mating only after satisfying the female's threshold duration of courtship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%