2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-01049-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual conflict drives micro- and macroevolution of sexual dimorphism in immunity

Abstract: Background Sexual dimorphism in immunity is believed to reflect sex differences in reproductive strategies and trade-offs between competing life history demands. Sexual selection can have major effects on mating rates and sex-specific costs of mating and may thereby influence sex differences in immunity as well as associated host–pathogen dynamics. Yet, experimental evidence linking the mating system to evolved sexual dimorphism in immunity are scarce and the direct effects of mating rate on im… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shared life-history trade-off scenario is supported by the positive direct effects of L males on female fecundity and by the negative genetic correlation between body size and spine length in males, but less so by the positive genetic correlation between female body size and male spine length (electronic supplementary material). It is also consistent with the fact that primary sexual traits in males and females show correlated evolution across Callosobruchus species [62] and comparative data suggest trade-offs between investment in primary sexual traits and other competing life-history demands, such as immunity [28], in this genus [55]. Irrespective of the underlying genetic mechanism, however, our results show that genetic variation associated with spine length in males is positively related to genetic variation in female lifetime offspring production, under the conditions in which our assays were performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This shared life-history trade-off scenario is supported by the positive direct effects of L males on female fecundity and by the negative genetic correlation between body size and spine length in males, but less so by the positive genetic correlation between female body size and male spine length (electronic supplementary material). It is also consistent with the fact that primary sexual traits in males and females show correlated evolution across Callosobruchus species [62] and comparative data suggest trade-offs between investment in primary sexual traits and other competing life-history demands, such as immunity [28], in this genus [55]. Irrespective of the underlying genetic mechanism, however, our results show that genetic variation associated with spine length in males is positively related to genetic variation in female lifetime offspring production, under the conditions in which our assays were performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…First, our phenotypic engineering experiment confirmed that shortening of these male-benefit spines has a direct positive effect on female fitness, previously only inferred from comparative studies [ 26 , 27 ]. Previous work has demonstrated that the spines cause injuries to the female reproductive tract [ 24 , 25 , 37 ] and induce an immune response in females [ 27 , 28 , 42 ]. Genital spine length in males is correlated with female reproductive tract morphology across populations [ 27 ] and species [ 26 ], where an evolutionary thickening of the reproductive tract is associated with longer spines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…C. maculatus has a polyandrous mating system with documented sexual conflict over (re)mating and high remating rates, leading to both pre-and post-copulatory sexual selection on males Crudgington & Siva-Jothy, 2000;Eady, 1995;Gay et al, 2009;Hotzy & Arnqvist, 2009). Once a male manages to successfully initiate copulation, spines on its genitalia help to prevent it from being dislodged but at the same time harm the female (Bagchi et al, 2021;Edvardsson & Tregenza, 2005;Rönn et al, 2007;Rönn & Hotzy, 2012). The effects of the genital spines and the harm imposed on the females have been found to correlate with a male's sperm competitiveness (Hotzy & Arnqvist, 2009) and, in a congener that exhibits similar genital structures, also increase female oviposition rate as a response to genital scarring (Haren et al, 2017).…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection regime protocols (Fig. 1a), outlined below, have previously been described and used in several, more long-term (up to 60 generations), experimental evolution studies in C. maculatus and have been shown to result in pronounced sex-specific adaptations (Bagchi et al, 2021;Baur et al, 2019;Baur & Berger, 2020;.…”
Section: Experimental Evolution Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%