Sexual conflict explains the extraordinary diversity of mechanisms regulating mitochondrial inheritance

Abstract

BackgroundMitochondria are predominantly inherited from the maternal gamete, even in unicellular organisms. Yet an extraordinary array of mechanisms enforce uniparental inheritance, which implies shifting selection pressures and multiple origins.ResultsWe consider how this high turnover in mechanisms controlling uniparental inheritance arises using a novel evolutionary model in which control of mitochondrial transmission occurs either during spermatogenesis (by paternal nuclear genes) or at/after fertilization (by maternal nuclear genes). The model treats paternal leakage as an evolvable trait. Our evolutionary analysis shows that maternal control consistently favours strict uniparental inheritance with complete exclusion of sperm mitochondria, whereas some degree of paternal leakage of mitochondria is an expected outcome under paternal control. This difference arises because mito-nuclear linkage builds up with maternal control, allowing the greater variance created by asymmetric inheritance to boost the efficiency of purifying selection and bring benefits in the long term. In contrast, under paternal control, mito-nuclear linkage tends to be much weaker, giving greater advantage to the mixing of cytotypes, which improves mean fitness in the short term, even though it imposes a fitness cost to both mating types in the long term.ConclusionsSexual conflict is an inevitable outcome when there is competition between maternal and paternal control of mitochondrial inheritance. If evolution has led to complete uniparental inheritance through maternal control, it creates selective pressure on the paternal nucleus in favour of subversion through paternal leakage, and vice versa. This selective divergence provides a reason for the repeated evolution of novel mechanisms that regulate the transmission of paternal mitochondria, both in the fertilized egg and spermatogenesis. Our analysis suggests that the widespread occurrence of paternal leakage and prevalence of heteroplasmy are natural outcomes of this sexual conflict.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0437-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

TALE homeobox heterodimer GSM1/GSP1 is a molecular switch that prevents unwarranted genetic recombination in Chlamydomonas

“…More recent genome analysis of natural populations in C. reinhardtii and in another green alga, Ostreococcus tauri , reported that recombination is not rare in the chloroplast genome, suggesting the occurrence of biparental inheritance (Blanc‐Mathieu et al ., ; Hasan et al ., ). These patterns are concordant with the suggestion (Birky, ; Radzvilavicius et al ., ) that biparental inheritance of organelles is ancestral, serving to recombine organelle genomes, and that the selective degradation of minus (chloroplast) or plus (mitochondrial) genomes in C. reinhardtii evolved secondarily to achieve the advantages of uniparental inheritance.…”

Metabolic remodelling associated with mtDNA: insights into the adaptive value of doubly uniparental inheritance of mitochondria

“…the coexistence of different mitochondrial haplotypes in the same nuclear background, which has been shown to cause physiological dysfunction [18,19]. SMI thus prevents potential intergenomic conflicts [18][19][20][21]. A plausible consequence of SMI, however, is that it puts severe antagonist sex-linked constraints on the evolution of mitochondria, e.g.…”

Maternal inheritance of mitochondria: implications for male fertility?

“…In fact, in theory, the accumulation of male fertility-impairing mutations in the mtDNA sequence should in itself select for a variety of evolutionary mechanisms that offset the negative effects to males. Such mechanisms might include genetic adaptations that occasionally permit paternal leakage in transmission of mtDNA at conception, thereby enabling male-harming haplotypes associated with particular ancestral matrilines to be replaced (Kuijper et al 2015, Radzvilavicius et al 2017. Alternatively, the presence of male fertility-impairing mutations in the mtDNA should invoke selection on the nuclear genome for compensatory counter-adaptations able to restore male fertility (Beekman et al 2014, Connallon et al 2017.…”