1991
DOI: 10.3109/00016489109138447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Dimorphism and Development of the Human Cochlea: Computer 3-D Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
67
2
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
67
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with numerous prior reports indicating a large extent of variation in human cochlear length (Bredberg 1968;Ulehlova et al 1987;Wright et al 1987;Hardy 1968;Kawano et al 1996;Ketten et al 1998: Skinner et al 2002. We did not observe a significant difference between female and male OC length as reported by Sato et al (1991), who found OC lengths of 32.3 T 1.8 mm for females and 37.1 T 1.6 mm for males (total n = 18). However, our findings are consistent with those of Ketten et al (1998) and Skinner et al (2002), who also reported no significant male-vs-female difference in OC length, based upon high-resolution CT studies and data from a large group of temporal bones (n = 33).…”
Section: Measurements Of Oc Sg and Mw And Implications For CIsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding is consistent with numerous prior reports indicating a large extent of variation in human cochlear length (Bredberg 1968;Ulehlova et al 1987;Wright et al 1987;Hardy 1968;Kawano et al 1996;Ketten et al 1998: Skinner et al 2002. We did not observe a significant difference between female and male OC length as reported by Sato et al (1991), who found OC lengths of 32.3 T 1.8 mm for females and 37.1 T 1.6 mm for males (total n = 18). However, our findings are consistent with those of Ketten et al (1998) and Skinner et al (2002), who also reported no significant male-vs-female difference in OC length, based upon high-resolution CT studies and data from a large group of temporal bones (n = 33).…”
Section: Measurements Of Oc Sg and Mw And Implications For CIsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Their 3D reconstruction of these measurements includes the elevation of the cochlear spiral and has a larger radius than the surface method, as halfway between the inner and outer edges of the BM may fall nearer to the second or third row of outer hair cells than to the junction of the outer pillar with the first outer hair cell. It will be shown that Sato et al 8 found the male average to be about 3 mm longer and the female average to be about 1 mm shorter than the same averages found by other methods. The reasons for these differences are unknown.…”
Section: Methods Used To Measure the Anatomical Length Of The Cochleamentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In a study of a single cochlea, they found good agreement with the Guild/ Schuknecht method when the serial sections were corrected by computer to be parallel to the mid-modiolar axis. This 3D method was applied by Sato et al 8 to study sex differences. However, unlike previous investigators, they measured along the inner and outer borders of the basilar membrane ͑BM͒ and took the average of the two lengths to represent cochlear length.…”
Section: Methods Used To Measure the Anatomical Length Of The Cochleamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Human cochleae lengths are highly variable among populations, 62 and the length is significantly longer in males than females. 63 This leads to significantly longer delays in male cochleae for lower frequencies to reach their characteristic place, in comparison to female cochleae, 16 and a subsequent decrease in neural synchrony. 39 Therefore, consistent with the present study, wave V latencies are later for males and have greater variability than for females.…”
Section: B Chirp 'Goodness-of-fit'mentioning
confidence: 99%