2021
DOI: 10.1037/com0000275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual dimorphism in classical conditioning? Sex differences in neophobia, latent inhibition, generalization, and extinction for rats (Rattus norvegicus) in a conditioned taste aversion preparation irrespective of housing conditions.

Abstract: This study aimed to assess possible sex differences and a potential impact of social housing conditions for some Pavlovian conditioning effects in a conditioned taste aversion preparation with rats. The results of Experiment 1 suggest sex differences in neophobia, latent inhibition, and generalization. Specifically, for females, neophobia, and generalization appeared to be stronger while latent inhibition seemed to be attenuated. Experiment 2 confirmed these sex differences in neophobia and generalization, whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provides an opportunity to understand neural processes by which this decision-making occurs. Animal studies of sex differences in CTA are mixed but tend to report that females develop less CTA than males [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. While this seems to be discordant with the human situation, careful reviews of sex differences in varying models of classical conditioning suggest that in situations involving stress, fear, or aversive stimulation, including conditioned taste aversion, males and females do not show quantitative differences in responding but utilize different strategies [12,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides an opportunity to understand neural processes by which this decision-making occurs. Animal studies of sex differences in CTA are mixed but tend to report that females develop less CTA than males [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. While this seems to be discordant with the human situation, careful reviews of sex differences in varying models of classical conditioning suggest that in situations involving stress, fear, or aversive stimulation, including conditioned taste aversion, males and females do not show quantitative differences in responding but utilize different strategies [12,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the voluntary acceptance of supplements, a key issue is the fact that rodents have a natural neophobia, and recent data indicate that this may be modulated by sex and age [12]. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate several factors that may influence the voluntary ingestion of a novel food in rats and refine protocols for supplement administration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%