2012
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ers308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants

Abstract: Among dioecious flowering plants, females and males often differ in a range of morphological, physiological, and life-history traits. This is referred to as sexual dimorphism, and understanding why it occurs is a central question in evolutionary biology. Our review documents a range of sexually dimorphic traits in angiosperm species, discusses their ecological consequences, and details the genetic and evolutionary processes that drive divergence between female and male phenotypes. We consider why sexual dimorp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
391
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 381 publications
(409 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
14
391
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…If reproductive costs are greater in females than males owing to fruit production, females may delay flowering, flower less often, or experience greater mortality compared with males. These effects could be especially important in clonal species in which cumulative episodes of sexual reproduction may result in sexual dimorphism in rates of clonal reproduction and the number of flowering ramets per clone (39,40). Interestingly, in the comparative analysis conducted by Field et al (37), the opposite pattern was found in both the species level and phylogenetically controlled analyses.…”
Section: Clonality In Plants With Sexual Polymorphismsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If reproductive costs are greater in females than males owing to fruit production, females may delay flowering, flower less often, or experience greater mortality compared with males. These effects could be especially important in clonal species in which cumulative episodes of sexual reproduction may result in sexual dimorphism in rates of clonal reproduction and the number of flowering ramets per clone (39,40). Interestingly, in the comparative analysis conducted by Field et al (37), the opposite pattern was found in both the species level and phylogenetically controlled analyses.…”
Section: Clonality In Plants With Sexual Polymorphismsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless, literature on the responses and preferences of dioecious plants to different inorganic nitrogen form is scarce. Previous studies documented that sexual dimorphisms result from different reproductive requirements of females and males, which cause sex-specific selection pressures, reduced survival of females under conditions with limited resources, unlike males with better tolerance to harsh environments (Barrett and Hough 2012). Therefore, the gender ratio is always biased to females under the favorable microhabitats and to males under unfavorable conditions (Dawson and Ehleringer 1993;Li et al 2007;Zhang et al 2009;Zhao et al 2012).…”
Section: Sex-specific Difference Of Biomass Accumulation and Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flower number may have important consequences for pollinator attraction (Barrett & Hough 2013). In Fuchsia parviflora, flower number in males was barely higher than that of female plants in most populations evaluated, even though floral longevity did not differ between genders.…”
Section: Sex Ratio In Fuchsia Parvifloramentioning
confidence: 88%