Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-03908-3_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Dimorphism in Flowers and Inflorescences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
102
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
(186 reference statements)
7
102
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Tapetal degeneration and pollen abortion, a characteristic of CMS in crop systems (Hanson and Bentolila, 2004) is prevented by pentatricopeptide (PPR) restorers, such as those identified in this Mimulus system (Barr and Fishman, 2010). This provides a simple mechanism for effects of restorer segregation (in a CMS background) on floral morphology in our hybrids, and may also contribute to the common observation that male-sterile (female) flowers are smaller in many gynodioecious taxa (Baker, 1948;Delph et al, 1996;Eckhart, 1999). Our results are also consistent with observations in crop CMS hybrids, in which cytoplasmic type has a variety of effects on floral morphology in addition to fertility (Zubko et al, 2003;Hanson and Bentolila, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tapetal degeneration and pollen abortion, a characteristic of CMS in crop systems (Hanson and Bentolila, 2004) is prevented by pentatricopeptide (PPR) restorers, such as those identified in this Mimulus system (Barr and Fishman, 2010). This provides a simple mechanism for effects of restorer segregation (in a CMS background) on floral morphology in our hybrids, and may also contribute to the common observation that male-sterile (female) flowers are smaller in many gynodioecious taxa (Baker, 1948;Delph et al, 1996;Eckhart, 1999). Our results are also consistent with observations in crop CMS hybrids, in which cytoplasmic type has a variety of effects on floral morphology in addition to fertility (Zubko et al, 2003;Hanson and Bentolila, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The causes behind this relationship are not understood fully, though there is some support for the idea of selection for greater perianth size in females to protect ovaries (Delph et al, 1996). In contrast, in gynodioecious species with separate male-sterile (female) and male-fertile (hermaphrodite) plants in natural populations, female corollas are almost always smaller than those of hermaphrodites (Baker, 1948;Delph et al, 1996;Eckhart, 1999;Shykoff et al, 2003). Two hypotheses have been proposed for this relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Males disperse their pollen from erect peduncles that are held above the plant, whereas hermaphrodites and females release their pollen from subsessile inflorescences in the leaf axils (Durand, 1963;Pannell, 1997c). We might therefore expect that pollen grains dispersed from specialized peduncles have a better chance of reaching stigmas on other plants than those dispersed from the leaf axil (Eckhart, 1999), which the recent study in M. annua confirms (Eppley and Pannell, 2007a). The corollary of this is that hermaphrodites effectively disperse less pollen than they produce, compared with males, so that o p is smaller than a linear trade-off would predict.…”
Section: Sm Eppley and Jr Pannellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…containing both the female and male sexual function within the same flower) but plant breeding systems with separate female and male functions in different individuals have evolved several times13. Numerous studies have shown that female flowers have lower rewards than hermaphrodites in gynodioecious species14. Similarly, in species with dichogamy, nectar quantity is typically highest during the males phase12.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most have been examined in isolation (e.g. comparing colour morphs19; or genders, reviewed in14), which does not adequately represent the complex factors impacting nectar quality. In the present study, we use the gynodioecious plant, Geranium sylvaticum (wood cranesbill), as a model species to examine the combined effect of abiotic and floral-specific traits on nectar’s sugar content and production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%