1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf02436582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual dimorphism in human skulls. A comparison of sexual dimorphism in different populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
8

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
23
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy rate obtained in this study with the application of the anthropology was equal or superior to the one found in other similar studies, pointing that the methods analyzed present a high discrimination efficiency between the sexes [4,7,[10][11][12][13][18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy rate obtained in this study with the application of the anthropology was equal or superior to the one found in other similar studies, pointing that the methods analyzed present a high discrimination efficiency between the sexes [4,7,[10][11][12][13][18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Especially in Brazil, such analysis becomes extremely necessary for it being a country with a multiracial general characteristic, with a mixture among white, black and indian people and with distinct regions in which there are specific and local miscegenation, such as in the South and Northeast [17]. Because of this, the anthropologic methodologies used in this study were selected according to the results of researches published in other countries, involving different populations such as the method of the Forensic Anthropology Data Bank (FDB) (1986) [9] and the method of Walker (2008) [14], with accuracy above 80% [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La taille est la principale manifestation du dimorphisme sexuel en biologie [16,17], mais sa variabilité et sa faible ampleur chez l'homme empêchent d'atteindre un taux de classification acceptable en identification. Les origines des autres variations squelettiques sont peu connues, elles sont souvent étiquetées comme « spécificités populationnelles » mais sont rarement définies.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Whites and Blacks from the Terry and Hamann‐Todd collections. Their success rates ranged from 82% to 89%, and subsequent analyses typically reported comparable classification accuracy . Using twentieth‐century Americans in the Forensic Anthropology Databank from the University of Tennessee, correct sex assessment rates of 88–90% are commonly reported .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%