Sexual dimorphism in the compound eye of the moth Operophtera brumata (Lepidoptera, Geometridae)

Abstract

Brachyptery in female moths is a common phenomenon. This article examines the eyes of the moth Operophtera brumata, in which only the males have wings. Both sexes possess eyes of the superposition type, have facets with corneal nipples, and exhibit eyeglow, but the eye of the male has 2174 facets, measures 725 mm in diameter, and has a clear zone of 112mm width. That of the female has 1352 facets, measures 557 mm across, and has a 77-mm-wide clear zone. There were no significant differences in rhabdom diameters (10 mm) and tracheal sheath development, but male rhabdoms were significantly longer (85 vs. 65 mm). Dark/light adaptational changes manifested themselves in the positions of the distal screening pigment granules: between the cones during darkness and into the clear zone during light adaptation. The combination of a larger radius of curvature, wider clear zone, and longer rhabdoms gives the males a sensitivity at least twice that of the female. The narrower interommatidial angles of the male (2.81 vs. 3.21) together with the well-developed tracheal rhabdom sheaths, furthermore, provide the eyes of the males with better resolution. Finally, eye-glow intensity in males diminishes considerably faster in light than it does in females. The differences between males and females appear to reflect their different roles: males begin to search after sunset in and around stands of trees for the pheromone-emitting females, which sit on the trunk of the tree under which they had emerged from their pupal case. Flying males encounter rapid light intensity changes and have to evade obstacles and enemies. The females are considerably more sedentary, but once mated, still seek suitable oviposition sites long after the males have ceased searching for them. During this activity, the females also need visual sensitivity and acuity, but less than the actively flying males.Additional key words: retina, eye glow, visual behavior, light/dark adaptation Invertebrate Biology 127(2): 201-216. r

The eye of the parthenogenetic and minute moth Ectoedemia argyropeza (Lepidoptera: Nepticulidae)

“…Analyses of the micrographs involved "ImageJ" open-source software (Rasband 1997-2008. Where comparisons between two data populations had to be carried out, the independent sample t-test for normally-distributed data was used and Wilcoxon's rank sum test (a.k.a.…”

“…Butterflies rely on apposition optics and their eyes lack the clear-zone, whereas moths usually possess eyes of the superposition type, for which the presence of a clear-zone is essential (Struwe, 1973;Eguchi, 1982;Meyer-Rochow & Gál, 2004;Meyer-Rochow & Lau, 2008).…”

Description and interpretation of the internal structure of a Cambrian crustacean compound eye

“…If eight sensory cells contribute to the formation of the rhabdom, under lower light conditions the amount of available photons to each one of them may not be high enough to generate a conductible electrical signal, but with only 5 retinula cells (i.e., 20% of the light entering the rhabdom versus 12.5% in rhabdoms composed by 8 cells) the share of photons each one receives is increased and may be sufficient to generate a conductible response. This calculation is based on the fact that aquatic isopods and amphipods (but not necessarily their semi-terrestrial relatives) appear to have but one spectral sensitivity peak (Donner 1971, Meyer-Rochow & Laughlin 1997; thus making it unlikely that spectrally different cells contribute to the bulk of the rhabdom.…”

Spectral Tuning in the Eyes of Deep-Sea Lanternfishes (Myctophidae): A Novel Sexually Dimorphic Intra-Ocular Filter

“…Although sexual dimorphism in the visual system has already been observed in insects (houseflies [Franceschini et al, 1981;Zeil, 1983], march flies [Hornstein et al, 2000], moths [Meyer-Rochow and Lau, 2008] and butterflies [Arikawa et al, 2005;Sison-Mangus et al, 2006]), crustaceans (copepods [Land, 1984[Land, , 1988) and primates [Hunt et al, 2005], to our knowledge, this is the first observation of sexual dimorphism in the visual system of any non-primate vertebrate. Within these examples, sexual dimorphism in the visual system has been observed at several levels, i.e.…”