Sexual dimorphism of head size in Gallotia galloti: testing the niche divergence hypothesis by functional analyses

Abstract

1. Two often cited hypotheses explaining sexual head size dimorphism in lizards are: sexual selection acting on structures important in intrasexual competition, and reduction of intersexual competition through food niche separation. 2. In this study some implicit assumptions of the latter hypothesis were tested, namely that an increase in gape distance and bite force should accompany the observed increase in head size. These assumptions are tested by recording bite forces, in vivo, for lizards of the species Gallotia galloti. In this species, male lizards have significantly larger heads than female conspecifics of similar snout–vent length. 3. Additionally, the average force needed to crush several potential prey species was determined experimentally and compared with the bite force data. This comparison clearly illustrates that animals of both sexes can bite much harder than required for most insect food items, which does not support the niche divergence hypothesis. The apparent ‘excess’ bite force in both sexes might be related to the partially herbivorous diet of the animals. 4. To unravel the origin of differences between sexes in bite capacity, the crushing phase of biting was modelled. The results of this model show different strategies in allocation of muscle tissue between both sexes. The origin of this difference is discussed and a possible evolutionary pathway of the development of the sexual dimorphism in the species is provided.

Multi-layered bird beaks: a finite-element approach towards the role of keratin in stress dissipation

“…A detailed description of this setup is available in the study of Herrel et al [32][33][34]. Secondly, DSPI was used to measure the displacements of the upper beak.…”

A performance-based cost to honest signalling in male green anole lizards (Anolis carolinensis)

“…This method has previously been shown to yield repeatable results in a variety of Anolis lizard species, including A. carolinensis [41,42,47]. We measured in vivo bite force using an isometric Kistler force transducer (type 9023, Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland) connected to a type 5058a Kistler charge amplifier (see [48,49] for a detailed description) using standard methods. Briefly, we induced lizards to bite down by placing the free ends of the plates between their jaws.…”

Rapid large-scale evolutionary divergence in morphology and performance associated with exploitation of a different dietary resource

“…Additionally, biomechanically relevant measurements including the jaw outlever, the inlever for jaw opening and jaw closing, and snout length were measured as described elsewhere (30). Bite forces were measured in 100 lizards (Pod Kopište, n ϭ 42; Pod Mrčaru, n ϭ 58) during the spring of 2004 using a Kistler force transducer set in a custom-built holder and connected to a Kistler charge amplifier (30,31). Lizards were induced to bite the transducer five times, and the maximal value was retained for analysis.…”