1975
DOI: 10.2307/2407271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Drive of Normal and SR Flies of Drosophila nebulosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, neither Drosophila bifasciata infected by male-killing Wolbachia nor Drosophila nebulosa infected by malekilling Spiroplasma presented different development time from their uninfected counterparts (Ikeda, 1970;Malogolowkin-Cohen and Rodrigues-Pereira, 1975). Fitness effects that could explain a relative increase of infected females in Drosophila species in which male-killers naturally occur have been previously reported for two cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies, neither Drosophila bifasciata infected by male-killing Wolbachia nor Drosophila nebulosa infected by malekilling Spiroplasma presented different development time from their uninfected counterparts (Ikeda, 1970;Malogolowkin-Cohen and Rodrigues-Pereira, 1975). Fitness effects that could explain a relative increase of infected females in Drosophila species in which male-killers naturally occur have been previously reported for two cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Ebbert (1991) reported that Spiroplasma-infected females of D. willistoni produced more offspring in early broods than uninfected females. Malogolowkin-Cohen and Rodrigues-Pereira (1975) reported that Spiroplasma-infected females of D. nebulosa became receptive to mating earlier than uninfected females. In all cases the fitness effects are not strong.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infection with spiroplasmas may affect fitness components of the host insects, such as body size, reproduction, and longevity (9,13,40). In this study, the titers of ef1␣, an index of the cell number in the host insect, were for the most part similar for female insects infected with NSRO and female insects infected with NSRO-A throughout the developmental course (data not shown), suggesting that the fitness effects, if there are any, are not drastically different between NSRO and NSRO-A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of detected fitness effects have been negative (Majerus 1999). Only two cases of benefit have been reported, in the drosophilids Drosophila willistoni and Drosophila nebulosa (Malogolowkin-Cohen and Rodriguez-Pereira 1975;Ebbert 1991), in both of which infected larvae develop faster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%