1999
DOI: 10.1177/106939719903300303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Equality and Romantic Love: A Reanalysis of Rosenblatt’s Study on the Function of Romantic Love

Abstract: The authors propose that the importance of romantic love as a basis for marriage will occur only in societies that allow both males and females to give or not give love freely. Based on their belief that sexual attraction or passion is a primary criterion of romantic love, the authors hypothesize that there will be a positive correlation between the importance of romantic love and social indicators of sexual equality. Rosenblatt's 11-point rating scale of romantic love is used to test this hypothesis. The auth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…"Sex" and "passion" fit with most of the definitions of romantic love that acknowledge the erotic/passionate aspect of romantic love (Sternberg, 1988(Sternberg, , 1996(Sternberg, , 2006, in his triangular theory of love posits passion as one vertex; Berscheid & Meyers, 1996;Berscheid & Regan, 2005, posit that love is a synthesis of companionate and passionate feelings). "Mutual" and "equality" fit with Lindholm's (1998aLindholm's ( , 1998b) discussion on the importance of equal status as a precipitating condition and attribute of romantic love, as well as de Korotayev's (1999) andde Munck et al's (2010) findings that romantic love, as a criterion for marriage, is causally related to an increase in female status and intimacy. While Sternberg views intimacy as a second vertex, he does not reflect on an assessment of mutuality as a necessary condition for intimacy.…”
Section: Examining Freelist Datasupporting
confidence: 59%
“…"Sex" and "passion" fit with most of the definitions of romantic love that acknowledge the erotic/passionate aspect of romantic love (Sternberg, 1988(Sternberg, , 1996(Sternberg, , 2006, in his triangular theory of love posits passion as one vertex; Berscheid & Meyers, 1996;Berscheid & Regan, 2005, posit that love is a synthesis of companionate and passionate feelings). "Mutual" and "equality" fit with Lindholm's (1998aLindholm's ( , 1998b) discussion on the importance of equal status as a precipitating condition and attribute of romantic love, as well as de Korotayev's (1999) andde Munck et al's (2010) findings that romantic love, as a criterion for marriage, is causally related to an increase in female status and intimacy. While Sternberg views intimacy as a second vertex, he does not reflect on an assessment of mutuality as a necessary condition for intimacy.…”
Section: Examining Freelist Datasupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The concept of passion is certainly not new. Psychologists and philosophers alike have been interested in the concept of passion for quite some time (Adler, 1937(Adler, /1995Darwin, 1872Darwin, /1998Derek, 1998;Freud, 1881Freud, /1992Hillman, 1960Hillman, /1992Levin, 1982;Olkowski, 1982), mainly investigating it as a component of healthy romantic relationships (deMunck & Korotayev, 1999;Fletcher, Simpson, Thomas, & Giles, 1999;Hatfield & Walster, 1978;Marston, Hecht, Manke, McDaniel, & Reeder, 1998;Peven & Shulman, 1999;Sternberg, 1986Sternberg, , 1988Sternberg, , 1997Sternberg & Hojjat, 1997;Whitley, 1993). Only recently has the concept of passion gained some popularity in the educational and managerial domains as a significant determinant of students', teachers', and managers' interest, enjoyment, satisfaction toward their work, and work quality (Maddock & Fulton, 1998;Schank & Joseph, 1998;Talley, 1996;Talley, Kubiszyn, Brassard, & Short, 1996).…”
Section: Passion For Interesting Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term mating strategies do not require romantic love under the condition of the extended family and thus romantic love will be suppressed in nonmatrilocal societies that practice arranged marriage. The qualification of nonmatrilocality as a postmarital residence practice is important because as has been shown previously (de Munck & Korotayev, 1999, 2007, romantic love becomes a more important criterion for marriage as female status increases; and in the subsequent paper, we show that intimacy between husband and wife (a necessary feature of romantic love according to Sternberg 1984Sternberg , 1988) is positively correlated with high female status. In matrilocal situations, female status is already, ceturis paribus, high and so in order to control for the effect of matrilocality we do not include these societies in our analysis.…”
Section: Evolutionary Arguments For the Existence Of Romantic Lovementioning
confidence: 78%
“…For the first study (de Munck & Korotayev, 1999), we relied on Rosenblatt's cross-cultural sample in which societies were scored as having high to low levels of romantic love based on 11 criteria coded by two independent researchers so that each society could be rated along a 0-22 point scale (by combining the ratings of the two coders). We dichotomized Rosenblatt's ratings because we had our doubts that the ratings could be so fine grained as to rank societies along a 22-point scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%