1997
DOI: 10.1006/cpac.1996.0110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Harassment and the Public Accounting Industry: The Need for Critical Examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Gallhofer (1998) criticises research that uses the term 'woman' as if it were a universal and unitary category which results in the suggestion that concerns addressed and issues raised are of equal importance and relevance for all women, thereby resulting in a failure to address the differences between women themselves. Hammond (1997) critiques Nichols et als' (1997) exploration of the interpretation of sexual harassment in accounting firms for failing to explore how sexual harassment reflects broader social conditions, and, by assuming an a-theoretical neutral position, for assuming that women are the cause of such harassment. What is known as a 'gender-as-a-variable' approach to exploring differences and gender divisions between men and women, has been subjected to extensive critique, suggesting that while these studies may address issues of critical importance to women, they primarily have an interest in gender as an object of study rather than as part of the research methodology and theoretical framework, and do little to contest inequalities and difference (Haynes, 2008a).…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gallhofer (1998) criticises research that uses the term 'woman' as if it were a universal and unitary category which results in the suggestion that concerns addressed and issues raised are of equal importance and relevance for all women, thereby resulting in a failure to address the differences between women themselves. Hammond (1997) critiques Nichols et als' (1997) exploration of the interpretation of sexual harassment in accounting firms for failing to explore how sexual harassment reflects broader social conditions, and, by assuming an a-theoretical neutral position, for assuming that women are the cause of such harassment. What is known as a 'gender-as-a-variable' approach to exploring differences and gender divisions between men and women, has been subjected to extensive critique, suggesting that while these studies may address issues of critical importance to women, they primarily have an interest in gender as an object of study rather than as part of the research methodology and theoretical framework, and do little to contest inequalities and difference (Haynes, 2008a).…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the stereotypes inherent in this work were later addressed (Maupin and Lehman, 1994) through the use of a more critical approach. The work of Nichols et al (1997), exploring gender differences in the interpretation of sexual harassment, was critiqued by Hammond (1997b) for failing to explore how sexual harassment reflects broader social conditions, and, by assuming an atheoretical neutral posture, for assuming that women are the cause of such harassment. Kirkham's (1997) response to Nichols et al (1997) conceptualises and embeds sexual harassment within a complex set of social and power relations constituting the accounting profession and its practices, which is the more powerful for being grounded in the actual working practices of women.…”
Section: Current Gender and Accounting Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for research in this area is well argued by several authors who contend that it is necessary to discard assumptions of feminist universality in order to not only explore differences between men and women, but also differences between women. These authors collectively call for broader, critical gender studies that embrace a discussion of class, race and culture to elucidate the origins and implications of such differences (see, for example, Hammond and Oakes, 1992;Hammond, 1997;Galhofer, 1998). 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%