Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Purpose of review Development of vaccines that protect against sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis, has progressed greatly over the past decade. However, little research has been conducted to examine STI vaccine acceptance and hesitancy and how these factors may impact future uptake. This review examines literature that could provide additional insights into factors that would impact STI vaccine acceptance and hesitancy. Recent findings Vaccine hesitancy remains a threat to the uptake of future STI vaccines despite recent findings that highlight high levels of acceptability. Vaccine characteristics including side effects postvaccination and cost could impact future uptake of these vaccines. Accurate information about the benefits of vaccination and the vaccine development process could help to improve vaccine acceptance. Summary STI vaccine development is progressing, leading to great promise that a chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis vaccine will one day be available. However, data is limited on factors that could impact vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and uptake. This research is instrumental in creating policies, programming and vaccination campaigns that could impact acceptance and uptake along with affordability and accessibility. Additional research is needed to better promote STI vaccines.
Purpose of review Development of vaccines that protect against sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis, has progressed greatly over the past decade. However, little research has been conducted to examine STI vaccine acceptance and hesitancy and how these factors may impact future uptake. This review examines literature that could provide additional insights into factors that would impact STI vaccine acceptance and hesitancy. Recent findings Vaccine hesitancy remains a threat to the uptake of future STI vaccines despite recent findings that highlight high levels of acceptability. Vaccine characteristics including side effects postvaccination and cost could impact future uptake of these vaccines. Accurate information about the benefits of vaccination and the vaccine development process could help to improve vaccine acceptance. Summary STI vaccine development is progressing, leading to great promise that a chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis vaccine will one day be available. However, data is limited on factors that could impact vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and uptake. This research is instrumental in creating policies, programming and vaccination campaigns that could impact acceptance and uptake along with affordability and accessibility. Additional research is needed to better promote STI vaccines.
IntroductionNovel STI prevention interventions, including doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) and meningococcal B vaccination (4CMenB) against gonorrhoea, have been increasingly examined as tools to aid STI control. There is emerging evidence of the efficacy of doxyPEP in preventing bacterial STIs; however limited data exist on the extent of use in the UK. We examined self-reported knowledge and use of antibiotic post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and intention to use (ITU) doxyPEP and 4CMenB among a large, community sample of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in the UK.MethodsUsing data collected by the RiiSH survey (November/December 2023), part of a series of online surveys of GBMSM in the UK, we describe (%, [95% CI]) self-reported knowledge and use of antibiotic PEP (including doxyPEP) and doxyPEP and 4CMenB ITU. Using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression, we examined correlates of ever using antibiotic PEP, doxyPEP ITU, and 4CMenB ITU, respectively, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and a composite marker of sexual risk defined as reporting (in the last three months): ≥5 condomless anal sex partners, bacterial STI diagnosis, chemsex, and/or meeting partners at sex-on-premises venues, sex parties, or cruising locations.ResultsOf 1,106 participants (median age: 44 years [IQR: 34-54]), 34% (30%-37%) knew of antibiotic PEP; 8% (6%-10%) ever reported antibiotic PEP use. Among those who did, most reported use in the last year (84%, 73/87) and exclusively used doxycycline (69%, 60/87). Over half of participants reported doxyPEP ITU (51% [47%-56%]) while over two-thirds (64% [60%-69%]) reported 4CMenB ITU. GBMSM with markers of sexual risk and with uptake of other preventative interventions were more likely to report ever using antibiotic PEP as well as doxyPEP and 4CMenB ITU, respectively. HIV-PrEP users and people living with HIV (PLWHIV) were more likely to report STI prophylaxis use and ITU than HIV-negative GBMSM not reporting recent HIV-PrEP use.DiscussionThere were high levels of intended use of novel STI prevention interventions. Fewer than one in ten GBMSM had reported ever using antibiotic PEP, with usage more common among those at greater risk of STIs. Future guidelines and health promotion for 4CMenB and antibiotic PEP must be carefully crafted alongside clinical experts and community partners, given intervention complexity and the risk of presenting conflicting public health messages regarding antimicrobial stewardship.
Novel STI prevention interventions, including doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) and meningococcal B vaccination (4CMenB) against gonorrhoea, have been increasingly examined as tools to aid STI control. There is evidence of the efficacy of doxyPEP in preventing bacterial STIs; however, limited data exist on the extent of use in the UK. We examined self-reported knowledge and use of antibiotic post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and intention to use (ITU) doxyPEP and 4CMenB among a large, community sample of men and gender-diverse individuals who have sex with men in the UK. Using data collected by the RiiSH survey (November/December 2023), part of a series of online surveys of men and other gender-diverse individuals in the UK, we describe (%, [95% CI]) self-reported knowledge and use of antibiotic PEP (including doxyPEP) and doxyPEP and 4CMenB ITU. Using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression, we examined correlates of ever using antibiotic PEP, doxyPEP ITU, and 4CMenB ITU, respectively, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and a composite marker of sexual risk defined as reporting (in the last three months): ≥5 condomless anal sex partners, bacterial STI diagnosis, chemsex, and/or meeting partners at sex-on-premises venues, sex parties, or cruising locations. Of 1,106 participants (median age: 44 years [IQR: 34–54]), 34% (30%-37%) knew of antibiotic PEP; 8% (6%-10%) ever reported antibiotic PEP use. Among those who did, most reported use in the last year (84%, 73/87) and exclusively used doxycycline (69%, 60/87). Over half of participants reported doxyPEP ITU (51% [95% CI: 47%-56%], 568/1,106) while over two-thirds (64% [95% CI: 60%-69%], 713/1,106) reported 4CMenB ITU. Participants with markers of sexual risk and with uptake of other preventative interventions were more likely to report ever using antibiotic PEP as well as doxyPEP and 4CMenB ITU, respectively. HIV-PrEP users and people living with HIV (PLWHIV) were more likely to report antibiotic PEP use and doxyPEP and 4CMenB vaccination ITU than HIV-negative participants not reporting recent HIV-PrEP use. Findings demonstrate considerable interest in the use of novel STI prevention interventions, more so for 4CMenB vaccination relative to doxyPEP. Fewer than one in ten participants had reported ever using antibiotic PEP, with most using appropriate, evidence-based antibiotics. The use of antibiotic PEP and the report of doxyPEP ITU and 4CMenB ITU was more common among those at greater risk of STIs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.