2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11195-013-9326-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Knowledge Among Adolescents with Physical Handicaps: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because few respondents had scores ≥4, these adolescents were grouped into the “3” category, creating the final 0–3 scale, indicating no (0), mild (1), moderate (2), and severe (3) disability (22).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because few respondents had scores ≥4, these adolescents were grouped into the “3” category, creating the final 0–3 scale, indicating no (0), mild (1), moderate (2), and severe (3) disability (22).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the few studies focused on sexual timing in populations with disabilities, findings suggest differences by disability type (35). In their cross-sectional study in Germany, Wienholz and colleagues (6) found that among sexually experienced 14–17 year olds, those with physical disabilities and vision or hearing impairments reported earlier sexual debut than those without disabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings support those of several articles and reviews published over the past decade. In particular, the overprotection and infantilisation of people with disabilities, as well as societal perception of the sexuality of individuals with disabilities as deviant have been reported as a major barriers to their sexual health education (Seidel et al 2014;Treacy, Taylor, and Abernathy 2018). This highlights the culturally influenced societal perceptions of disability (Wilson and Scior 2015;Munyi 2012), and, in particular, of disability in combination with sexuality (Ditchman 2017;Esmail et al 2010;Sinclair et al 2015).…”
Section: Links To Existing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All other barriers seem to be linked to this fundamental societal barrier: if people's sexuality, and, in particular, that of children and young people with disabilities, is not recognised or is stigmatised, the way educators address this topic and redirect responsibility to each other will be affected (McCann, Marsh, and Brown 2019). This fundamental barrier also explains the lack of training opportunities for educators and the dominance of noncomprehensive and normative approaches to sexuality education (McCann, Marsh, and Brown 2019;Seidel et al 2014).…”
Section: Links To Existing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation