2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual orientation and disordered eating behaviors among self-identified male and female college students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
75
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
75
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with findings from prior studies, Matthews-Ewald et al examined data from the NCHA and found that, after adjusting for other risk factors (binge drinking, stress, smoking, depression, fraternity/sorority membership, college athletics participation, and race/ethnicity), gay, bisexual, and unsure men reported 3–4.5 times the odds of purging compared to heterosexual men. [22] This trend is consistent with that found in younger adolescent males from pooled data from the 1999–2013 Massachusetts YRBS, analyzed by Watson and colleagues [33]. In 1999 and 2001, gay adolescent males in the Massachusetts YRBS had nearly 16 times the odds of heterosexual men of purging.…”
Section: Epidemiologic Surveillancesupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with findings from prior studies, Matthews-Ewald et al examined data from the NCHA and found that, after adjusting for other risk factors (binge drinking, stress, smoking, depression, fraternity/sorority membership, college athletics participation, and race/ethnicity), gay, bisexual, and unsure men reported 3–4.5 times the odds of purging compared to heterosexual men. [22] This trend is consistent with that found in younger adolescent males from pooled data from the 1999–2013 Massachusetts YRBS, analyzed by Watson and colleagues [33]. In 1999 and 2001, gay adolescent males in the Massachusetts YRBS had nearly 16 times the odds of heterosexual men of purging.…”
Section: Epidemiologic Surveillancesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The American College Health Association National College Health Assessment (NCHA) dataset, examined by Matthews-Ewald and colleagues [22] and Diemer and colleagues [23] provided a unique opportunity to study the intersections of sexual and gender minority identities. However, whereas Matthews-Ewald and colleagues excluded transgender participants from analysis, Diemer and colleagues identified differences in past-year diagnosis and treatment for AN and BN by sexual orientation among cisgender (i.e., individuals whose gender identities align with their birth sexes) and transgender college students.…”
Section: Epidemiologic Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transgender participants were also significantly more likely than members of any other group, including cisgender sexual minorities, to report past year ED diagnosis and past month CBs. Consistent with prior research, we found that eating-related pathology was more prevalent among those with transgender and SM identities (eg., (7-9, 13, 18)). As in previous studies, women who were unsure of their sexual orientation were more likely to have engaged in CBs than cisgender heterosexual women (13, 17), cisgender SM women had significantly lower rates of CBs than cisgender heterosexual women, and cisgender heterosexual men had decreased rates of all three outcomes (13, 27, 28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have found elevated rates of disordered eating among individuals unsure of their sexual orientation relative to their same-gender heterosexual counterparts (e.g., (13, 17)). A recent study examining differences in disordered eating by sexual orientation using data from the American College Health Association's National College Health Assessment (ACHA-NCHA) found that men who identified as gay, bisexual, and unsure of their sexual orientation were all significantly more likely than heterosexual men to have an ED diagnosis and to engage in CBs, whereas associations among women were inconsistent and less robust (18). The authors stratified their analyses by gender, which prevented comparisons of heterosexual and SM males to heterosexual women, the most well studied group in the ED literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%