2015
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual rest and post‐meiotic sperm ageing in house mice

Abstract: Fertilization by aged sperm can result in adverse fitness consequences for both males and females. Sperm storage during male sexual rest could provide an environment for post-meiotic sperm senescence causing a deterioration in the quality of stored sperm, possibly impacting on both sperm performance (e.g. swimming ability) and DNA quality. Here, we compared the proportion of sperm with fragmented DNA, an indicator of structural damage of DNA within the sperm cell, among males that had been sexually rested for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; but see Firman et al. ). We interpret this finding as a fertilization bias, rather than a bias attributable to variance in embryo viability, as we found no significant effect of sperm age on offspring production (i.e., our fecundity measure) in the noncompetitive fertilization trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…; but see Firman et al. ). We interpret this finding as a fertilization bias, rather than a bias attributable to variance in embryo viability, as we found no significant effect of sperm age on offspring production (i.e., our fecundity measure) in the noncompetitive fertilization trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A second sperm sample was taken the day after, and a third sperm sample after 4 days of being sexually rested. This procedure ensured that any differences in sperm characteristics would be intrinsic differences in quality rather than differences due to depletion [8] or fresh sperm effects [4143] (but see [44]), and only data collected after all males were manually depleted was used. For logistic reasons, males were divided in three sampling batches consisting of 5 aviaries, and all three batches were processed 5 days apart.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found no evidence that the subsample identity and hence preejaculation sperm age had any differential effect on offspring viability (subset effect: χ 2 1 = 0.063, P = 0.97). In many animals, males continuously release unused sperm, apparently to avoid preejaculation sperm aging (22)(23)(24), and this continuous release may explain the lack of an effect.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%