Encyclopedia of Life Sciences 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0023667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Selection and Life History Allocation

Abstract: A comprehensive explanation for sexual trait diversity depends on integrating life history theory and sexual selection to compare costs and benefits of sexual traits. A universal cost for all sexual traits involves the resources required to create and maintain them, which are consequently unavailable to other life history characters. This resource trade‐off typically causes covariance between an organism's resource budget and its level of sexual trait expression, which is known as condition‐dependence. Conditi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, and in previous studies we consistently see a positive relationship between ornamentation and fecundity (Figure b; Wheeler, ; Funk & Tallamy, ). However, correlations among phenotypic traits do not always reveal underlying trade‐offs because animals vary in both resource acquisition and allocation (Van Noordwijk & de Jong, ), and we are unable to measure resource acquisition and allocation directly (Houslay & Bussière, ). We note, though, that in a comparison between R. longicauda and Rhamphomyia sociabilis , a dance fly with no inflatable abdomen or other female ornament, the abdomen size is a much better predictor of fecundity in unornamented R .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, and in previous studies we consistently see a positive relationship between ornamentation and fecundity (Figure b; Wheeler, ; Funk & Tallamy, ). However, correlations among phenotypic traits do not always reveal underlying trade‐offs because animals vary in both resource acquisition and allocation (Van Noordwijk & de Jong, ), and we are unable to measure resource acquisition and allocation directly (Houslay & Bussière, ). We note, though, that in a comparison between R. longicauda and Rhamphomyia sociabilis , a dance fly with no inflatable abdomen or other female ornament, the abdomen size is a much better predictor of fecundity in unornamented R .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have simultaneously manipulated resource acquisition and access to reproductive opportunities while also examining the resultant patterns of energy storage and use (Kotiaho 2000). Recently, it has become clear that traits used to measure condition are themselves condition-dependent (and are built using the resources that make up condition), meaning that traits reflecting condition must inevitably trade-off with one another (Tomkins et al 2004;Houslay & Bussi ere 2012). This fact prescribes careful interpretation of covariances between proxies for condition and other life-history traits and highlights the need for more direct measurements of energy reserves (Morehouse 2014;Wilder, Raubenheimer & Simpson 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing how life-history trade-offs affect investment in sexual trait expression is a challenging task. The resource pool itself cannot be measured directly via phenotypic traits: many such traits may covary with an individual's resource budget, but must themselves have been constructed using resources and therefore will necessarily be traded against other life-history traits (Hunt et al 2004b;Houslay & Bussi ere 2012). Residuals of body mass over a fixed measure of body size are commonly used as a proxy for condition (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameter estimates describing the effect of age, mating status, and species on egg development (× denotes interaction terms). This pattern suggests that females of the ornamented species rely to a greater degree on male nuptial gifts compared with females from unadorned species (see Table 3), which provides long-awaited support for Cumming's hypothesis, and can help to explain the otherwise confounding diversity of sexual trait expression among dance flies : Houslay & Bussière, 2012. This model explained a significant fraction of the variation in natural log-standardised egg sizes (mm 2 ) (R 2 -adjusted = 0.1756, P = 0.0002, n = 118).…”
Section: How Mate Acquisition Relates To Investment In Ornamentsmentioning
confidence: 75%