1999
DOI: 10.1017/s0952836999010018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual size and shape dimorphism in two species of newts, Triturus cristatus and T. vulgaris (Caudata: Salamandridae)

Abstract: Morphometric data from Fennoscandian populations of the crested newt Triturus cristatus and the smooth newt Triturus vulgaris were analysed for the presence of sexual size and shape dimorphism. The data sets included nine body-related and nine head-related measurements and were examined with univariate, bivariate and multivariate methods. Sexual dimorphism was demonstrated in both species. The separation of specimens was highly related to sex. Although the expression of sexual dimorphism differed between the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…European newts have been the subject of many SSD studies, in which a number of conspecific and congeneric populations were examined (Kalezić et al. 1992; Malmgren 1999; Malmgren and Thollesson 1999). A female‐biased pattern of SSD was found to prevail, but with marked interspecies differences in the degree of dimorphism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…European newts have been the subject of many SSD studies, in which a number of conspecific and congeneric populations were examined (Kalezić et al. 1992; Malmgren 1999; Malmgren and Thollesson 1999). A female‐biased pattern of SSD was found to prevail, but with marked interspecies differences in the degree of dimorphism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies of sexual dimorphism in chelonians and other reptiles have concentrated on body size (Berry & Shine, 1980;Fitch, 1981;Wilbur & Morin, 1988;Gibbons & Lovich, 1990;Yasuka et al, 1996), but differences in shape are more likely to reflect sexual selection (Bonnet et al, 2001). Recent work on several animal groups has shown the value of shape in the study of sexual selection, particularly using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to compare characters in males and females adjusted for differences in body size (Bull & Pamula, 1996;Abell et al, 1999;Malmgren & Thollesson, 1999). Nevertheless, it may be difficult to distinguish between natural selection for fecundity and sexual selection for courtship success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies provided important and detailed information on SSD and on many other sexually dimorphic traits. However, few studies have explored the links between the male and female reproductive roles and their influence on overall body shape (Bonnet et al, 1998;Allison et al, 1999;Malmgren & Thollesson, 1999), and none is available in chelonians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%