2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexuality and sexism: Differences in ambivalent sexism across gender and sexual identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is currently not clear whether LGBTQ+ participants interpret sexism items in the same way as heteronormative participants, and whether the inventory measures the same thing in non-heteronormative contexts. For example, as discussed in Cowie, Greaves, and Sibley [ 55 ], it is possible, that although LGBTQ+ participants fall outside of the heteronormative gender framework and their interpretation of sexism measures differs from that of heteronormative people, LGBTQ+ still live in societies with a heteronormative gender system, and thus they might still be influenced by the same cultural factors as their heteronormative peers. Second, the broad representative sampling necessarily limited the number of scale items measuring benevolent sexism to five items.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is currently not clear whether LGBTQ+ participants interpret sexism items in the same way as heteronormative participants, and whether the inventory measures the same thing in non-heteronormative contexts. For example, as discussed in Cowie, Greaves, and Sibley [ 55 ], it is possible, that although LGBTQ+ participants fall outside of the heteronormative gender framework and their interpretation of sexism measures differs from that of heteronormative people, LGBTQ+ still live in societies with a heteronormative gender system, and thus they might still be influenced by the same cultural factors as their heteronormative peers. Second, the broad representative sampling necessarily limited the number of scale items measuring benevolent sexism to five items.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 6,017 participants, 3714 were women and 2303 men. Participants’ gender was measured as a binary variable because the ambivalent sexism inventory has exclusively been validated for heteronormative samples and there are no current validation studies demonstrating measurement invariance for LGBTQ+ samples [see 55 ]. 74.47% of women and 79.77% of men were parents in 2012, which grew up to 76.10% for women and 81.13% for men in 2014.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as we are aware, no prior research has analysed populism in the LGBT+ community and very little has examined authoritariantype measures within this population (Pacilli, Taurino, Jost & van der Toorn, 2011;Warriner, Nagoshi & Nagoshi, 2013). We would broadly expect LGBT+ people to score lower in terms of authoritarianism, as they are less likely to endorse traditional roles and people that score higher in authoritarian measures have been shown to be more homophobic/ heterosexist (Cowie, Greaves & Sibley, 2019;Pacilli et al, 2011).…”
Section: Gender and Lgbt+mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Interestingly, sexist attitudes are found across the spectrum of sexual orientation. The research focused on the relationship between sexism and sexual orientation has suggested that sexual minority people internalize sexist attitudes from a patriarchal society, regardless of their self-interest, attitudes, and behaviors (Cowie et al, 2019 ; Hässler et al, 2021 ; Salvati et al, 2018 ). Additionally, relations with adjustment have been found using gender similarity: Young adults who felt similar to their own gender reported lower social anxiety than other groups (Andrews et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Gender Similarity: Gender and Sexual Orientation Make A Differencementioning
confidence: 99%