2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexually dimorphic muscarinic acetylcholine receptor modulation of contextual fear learning in the dentate gyrus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To test the role of α5-GABA A Rs expressed on interneurons and pyramidal neurons in etomidate’s suppression of hippocampus-dependent memory, we employed the Context Preexposure Facilitation Effect (CPFE) learning paradigm (Fig. 2a) – a variant of contextual fear conditioning that separates the contextual learning and aversive phases of conditioning 39, 40, 41, 42 . This paradigm takes advantage of the “immediate shock deficit” 43 , wherein mice that are shocked immediately after they are placed in a novel context fail to associate the context and shock, whereas mice that were pre-exposed to the context on the preceding day recall the context rapidly and successfully associate it with the shock 44, 45 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To test the role of α5-GABA A Rs expressed on interneurons and pyramidal neurons in etomidate’s suppression of hippocampus-dependent memory, we employed the Context Preexposure Facilitation Effect (CPFE) learning paradigm (Fig. 2a) – a variant of contextual fear conditioning that separates the contextual learning and aversive phases of conditioning 39, 40, 41, 42 . This paradigm takes advantage of the “immediate shock deficit” 43 , wherein mice that are shocked immediately after they are placed in a novel context fail to associate the context and shock, whereas mice that were pre-exposed to the context on the preceding day recall the context rapidly and successfully associate it with the shock 44, 45 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a preexposure-dependent contextual fear conditioning paradigm adapted from Cushman et al, 2012 108 . This paradigm, which is often referred to in the literature as the Context Preexposure Facilitation Effect (CPFE) paradigm 40, 41, 42 takes advantage of the so-called “immediate shock deficit” 39, 43 , wherein animals that are shocked immediately (within several seconds) upon entry into a novel environment do not freeze on subsequent re-exposure, whereas mice that had been exposed on a prior day do exhibit a freezing response. The proposed explanation is that preexposed mice establish a hippocampus-dependent representation of the environment (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon arrival in the facility, all mice were placed on a 40 mg/kg DOX diet (Bio-Serv, product F4159, Lot 226766) and left undisturbed for a minimum of 3 d prior to surgery with ad libitum access to food and water. We originally tested our hypotheses in males because contextual fear conditioning in rodents is sexually dimorphic, where males typically show higher freezing levels than females 76 78 and wanted to ensure that our effect was large enough to warrant further experimentation. We also decided to use female exposure as a positive stimulus, and exposure to males may not necessarily be a positive experience for the females.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though we did not see any darting in either sex in our study, our findings support the growing notion that males and females show a distinct behavioral pattern of responses during fear learning, recall and extinction when compared with males. 22,43,[50][51][52]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%