2018
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2018.2874124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SGCO: Stabilized Green Crosshaul Orchestration for Dense IoT Offloading Services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The computing energy consumption of the UAV in n th slot changes along with the computing frequency in n th slot . Hence, the computing energy consumption for user k at the UAV in n th slot is derived as where is the effective switched capacitance of the CPU [ 38 , 40 , 49 , 50 ]. The computing energy consumption of the UAV during the period of T is expressed as …”
Section: System Model and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computing energy consumption of the UAV in n th slot changes along with the computing frequency in n th slot . Hence, the computing energy consumption for user k at the UAV in n th slot is derived as where is the effective switched capacitance of the CPU [ 38 , 40 , 49 , 50 ]. The computing energy consumption of the UAV during the period of T is expressed as …”
Section: System Model and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 for the simulation model and suppose that there is an arbitrary number of IoT devices N in the range of [50, 100] associated with an MEC server via the corresponding eRRH during each unit timeslot t. The timeslot duration is set to 1 ms. Uplink data rates of IoT devices r i vary in the range of [128, 1000] kbps, representing different services such as sensor reading, motion detection, online games, augmented reality, and video surveillance. For each uploading data stream from the IoT device, we assume that a complexity set of {10, 50, 100, 500, 1000} cycle/bit is given through intensive analysis and classification of experimental executions, as done in [25], [26], [28], and the workload computation complexity c i is mapped to one in this set. Following these To follow the assumption in Section II-A that the MEC server is designed with sufficient resources to maintain its computational stability and buffer stability, to account for the maximum arrival rate with some redundancy, we selected the maximum CPU frequency of MEC server f max to be equal to (100 + 30)% of the average workload arrival rate resulting in 2.6 GHz.…”
Section: A Simulation Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projeções apontam que as aplicações IoT utilizando LoRaWAN serão densas [Dao et al 2018], gerando a incapacidade de um GW decodificar corretamente os sinais simultâneos enviados por dispositivos que utilizam o mesmo SF no mesmo CF, tornandose necessário considerar um mecanismo de alocação de recursos eficiente para ajustar os parâmetros de rádio para mitigar os efeitos da densificação de uma LoRaWAN. Desta forma,é possível fornecer um tradeoff entre o aumento da cobertura ao mesmo tempo que reduz o atraso, energia e interferência.…”
Section: Visão Geral Do Cenáriounclassified