2015
DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shade‐Matching Performance Using a New Light‐Correcting Device

Abstract: The light-correcting device influenced the shade-matching performance; however, the attached polarization filter did not improve the results of the shade matching.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…From the studies reporting significant influence of gender on VSM, only two of them matched natural teeth to a specific shade guide, which simulates clinical practice. The main disadvantage of both studies is the small number of observers, six females and six males or sixteen females and five males . A multicenter study with 305 females and 309 males observers from nine countries, showed a better shade matching performance for females than males .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From the studies reporting significant influence of gender on VSM, only two of them matched natural teeth to a specific shade guide, which simulates clinical practice. The main disadvantage of both studies is the small number of observers, six females and six males or sixteen females and five males . A multicenter study with 305 females and 309 males observers from nine countries, showed a better shade matching performance for females than males .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gender influence on the accuracy of visual shade matching is controversial. Some studies reported a better performance from males, others favored females, and many studies showed no evidence of gender influence on VSM …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The − a* axis extends toward green and −b* toward blue. The value (or lightness) axis which is the z axis extends upward with values ranging from 0 (black) to 100 (white) and is given the name L* [23] CIELab* color difference ∆E* is a value introduced to evaluate color changes. A ∆E* below 1.2 is not perceptible to human eyes; while values up to 2.7 are considered clinically acceptable.…”
Section: Figure 1 Correlation Between ∆E Values Obtained After Stainmentioning
confidence: 99%