2023
DOI: 10.3390/s23031526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shadow Filters Using Multiple-Input Differential Difference Transconductance Amplifiers

Abstract: This paper presents new voltage-mode shadow filters employing a low-power multiple-input differential difference transconductance amplifier (MI-DDTA). This device provides multiple-input voltage-mode arithmetic operation capability, electronic tuning ability, high-input and low-output impedances. Therefore, the proposed shadow filters offer circuit simplicity, minimum number of active and passive elements, electronic control of the natural frequency and the quality factor, and high-input and low-output impedan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the proposed comb filter utilizing the VDGA is meticulously compared in Table 2 with existing circuits found in the literature, considering various aspects such as application, technology, active block, number of active blocks, number of passive components, voltage supply, rejection frequency, notch depth, and THD. Table 2 clearly illustrates that the circuits documented in studies [12,13,15,18,19,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], and Kumngern et al [33] are primarily designed for notching a single frequency only. Through this comparative analysis, it is evident that the proposed structure stands out as highly advantageous, requiring fewer active blocks and passive components when compared to designs presented in studies [14,16,17,21], all while achieving notching for the same number of undesirable frequencies (n=4).…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of the proposed comb filter utilizing the VDGA is meticulously compared in Table 2 with existing circuits found in the literature, considering various aspects such as application, technology, active block, number of active blocks, number of passive components, voltage supply, rejection frequency, notch depth, and THD. Table 2 clearly illustrates that the circuits documented in studies [12,13,15,18,19,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], and Kumngern et al [33] are primarily designed for notching a single frequency only. Through this comparative analysis, it is evident that the proposed structure stands out as highly advantageous, requiring fewer active blocks and passive components when compared to designs presented in studies [14,16,17,21], all while achieving notching for the same number of undesirable frequencies (n=4).…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For advanced configurations, Kumngern et al [32] implement a multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) OTAbased notch filter using 0.18µm DTMOS technology. Finally, a multiple-input differential difference transconductance amplifier (MI-DDTA)-based notch filter is proposed in 0.18µm CMOS technology [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is based on the employment of an external amplifier stage and a “hidden” filter stage within the core of the filter. This is actually the concept of shadow filtering introduced in Lakys and Fabre 16,17 and utilized in previous studies 18–34 in the case of second‐order filters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%