Shadow organizing and imitation: new foci for research

Abstract

Purpose Shadow organizing refers to the emergence of parallel arrangements that sit alongside and imitate mainstream or conventional ways of organizing. It can be a response to challenges that require new ways of working without abandoning what is valuable about conventional arrangements. However, the processes through which shadow organizing is accomplished are not well understood; there is a need to go beyond traditional notions of mimicry and metaphor. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This paper demonstrates how a Tardean approach to imitation can address this gap. It deploys imitation as an explanatory concept, based on contemporary readings of Tarde, as well as understandings of organizing as an unfolding process. Child and Family Centres in Tasmania (Australia), are used as an example of shadow organizing, delivering integrated health and education services in an emerging parallel arrangement. Findings The analysis highlights an imitation dynamic which is far from straightforward mimicry. Rather, it comprises repetition and generation of difference. This dynamic is conceptualized in Tardean fashion as three patterns: the imitation of ideas before expression; the selective nature of imitation; and insertion of the old alongside the new. Originality/value The paper moves beyond metaphors of shadow organizing, and understandings of shadow organizing as mimicry. Conceptualizing imitation in an alternative way, it contributes fresh insights into how shadow organizing is accomplished. This enriches and expands the conceptual apparatus for researchers wishing to understand the betwixt and between of shadow organizing.

Navigating in a landscape of practices : Healthcare students’ interprofessional collaboration and learning

“…Jensen (2018) explains that "shadow organizing represents an efficient way of handling tensions and demands in the field related to professional socialization" (p. 97). A similar, but broader suggestion on how to explain shadow organizing is offered by Hopwood & Jensen (2019). The metaphor symbolises parallel arrangements where one of the arrangements imitates the other, and where the other usually is the mainstream or conventional arrangement.…”

Exploring the many tales behind success: understanding translations of the “intrapreneurships” management fashion as editing processes

“…It follows that widely circulated concepts tend to be formulated in general and abstract terms (Gondo and Amis, 2013). Context-bound rules can also be about establishing connections between a model and concepts and/or practices that are already established in an actual setting, and dis-embedding them from concepts and practices considered as foreign and threatening (e.g., Boxenbaum, 2006; Gond and Boxenbaum, 2013; Hopwood and Jensen, 2019). A second set of rules concerns logic.…”