2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-012-1404-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shadowgraph, Schlieren and interferometry in a 2D cavitating channel flow

Abstract: International audienceCavitation plays an important role in fuel atomization mechanisms but the physics of cavitation and its impact on spray formation and injector efficiency are not well documented yet. Experimental investigations are required to support the development and the validation of numerical models and the design of tomorrow's injectors, in the context of pollutant and fuel consumption reduction. The complexity of modern injectors and the extreme conditions of injection do not facilitate experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, images from real-size nozzles do not have a good enough resolution to allow a detailed identification of flow structures. For that reason, several studies have been conducted in simplified nozzle geometries (Winklhofer et al, 2001;Mauger et al, 2012) that allow the use of experimental techniques such as Shadowgraph or Schlieren imaging. Experiments in these configurations have been used repeatedly for validation purposes of mathematical models for cavitation (Kärrholm et al, 2007;Som et al, 2010;Rakshit and Schmidt, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, images from real-size nozzles do not have a good enough resolution to allow a detailed identification of flow structures. For that reason, several studies have been conducted in simplified nozzle geometries (Winklhofer et al, 2001;Mauger et al, 2012) that allow the use of experimental techniques such as Shadowgraph or Schlieren imaging. Experiments in these configurations have been used repeatedly for validation purposes of mathematical models for cavitation (Kärrholm et al, 2007;Som et al, 2010;Rakshit and Schmidt, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to validate the choice of solver, several test cases were run and compared against the work of Mauger et al [21] (hereafter referred to simply as 'Mauger'). The Mauger experiment utilized a shadowgraph like optical setup with a narrow channel sandwiched between glass plates.…”
Section: Validation Of Solver Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the highest pressure drop the simulations at ΔP = 35 bar under predict the cavitation. [21] There may also be an effect from nominally small geometric differences between the nozzle inlet profile; in the calculations the model has 90° inlet while the Mauger test has a visibly larger angle with an inlet radius estimated to be up to 10μm.…”
Section: Validation Of Solver Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nozzles are fundamental to a wide range of industrial processes such as spray painting, jet cutting and fuel injection systems. This application was chosen for a number of reasons: the geometry is simple and experiments for which measurements are available such as Winklhofer et al [31] or Mauger et al [18], the problem is of commercial interest (e.g. to support emissions regulations) and there exists a wide body of previous studies upon which to build.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%