1996
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/282.1.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shadowing of the 0.25-keV extragalactic X-ray background by the disc of NGC 55

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results, which are based on new Chandra X-ray observations of the source, are consistent with the tidal tail being located in front of the soft X-ray nebula in our line of sight, such that the soft X-ray emission is partially absorbed by the cold gas in the tidal tail. Moreover, Iwasawa et al (2011) derived a lower limit on the column density of N H ∼ 10 22 cm −2 , which is similar to that of edge-on galaxy disks and consistent with other measurements of disk shadowing (Barber et al 1996). Iwasawa et al (2011) concluded that the source of the soft X-ray emitting gas is likely to be star formation in the edge-on disk, which would be, a priori, consistent with our INT/WFC image.…”
Section: Int Imaging: Low Surface Brightness Emission At Large Scalessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Their results, which are based on new Chandra X-ray observations of the source, are consistent with the tidal tail being located in front of the soft X-ray nebula in our line of sight, such that the soft X-ray emission is partially absorbed by the cold gas in the tidal tail. Moreover, Iwasawa et al (2011) derived a lower limit on the column density of N H ∼ 10 22 cm −2 , which is similar to that of edge-on galaxy disks and consistent with other measurements of disk shadowing (Barber et al 1996). Iwasawa et al (2011) concluded that the source of the soft X-ray emitting gas is likely to be star formation in the edge-on disk, which would be, a priori, consistent with our INT/WFC image.…”
Section: Int Imaging: Low Surface Brightness Emission At Large Scalessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…which is fully consistent with Barber et al (1996) within the uncertainties. After seven iteration steps no further improvement can be achieved.…”
Section: Testing the Two Dimensional Correlationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We assume an average spectral index of Γ = 1.5 according to Hasinger et al (2001). Its ROSAT C-band intensity was determined by Barber et al (1996); they derived I EXTRA = 228 × 10 −6 cts s −1 arcmin −2 with an uncertainty of 90 × 10 −6 cts s −1 arcmin −2 . Throughout the fit procedure (see Sect.…”
Section: The Extragalactic Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the extremely simple approach that the 1/4 keV intensity across the entire field of interest is constant for all three SXRB source components. The derived intensities are -fiocai = 4.4-10 -6 ctss -1 arcmin -2 , /halo = 16-10 -6 ctss -1 arcmin -2 and / e x t r a = 2.3-10 -6 ctss _ 1 arcmin -2 (Barber et al 1996) and constant across the field of interest. The Galactic X-ray halo is the brightest X-ray source of all.…”
Section: T H E Soft X-ray Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If we sum the X-ray absorption of the WNM and the HVC filament we expect to detect a ~ 26% intensity variation in the ROSAT 3/4keV data. The HVC may be so distant (Wakker & van Woerden 1997) that its column density distribution only attenuates the extragalactic background radiation with an intensity of /extra(3/4 keV) ~ 0.53 • 1 0 -4 c t s s -1 arcmin -2 (Barber et al 1996). This gives a 3/4keV intensity attenuation of AT e xtra(WNM + HVC) = 0.10 • 10~4 cts s-1 arcmin -2 which is extremely difficult to detect significantly, even in deep pointed PSPC observations.…”
Section: ° 'Kmentioning
confidence: 99%