2019 IEEE 90th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Fall) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/vtcfall.2019.8891137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shadows Don't Lie: n-Sequence Trajectory Inspection for Misbehaviour Detection and Classification in VANETs

Abstract: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They designed plausibility metrics with six features: (i) local plausibility check: sender's location is compared with a predicted plausible location and the distribution of average acceleration; (ii) movement plausibility check: this feature check the plausibility of the total displacement with the average velocity during the entire trip and compare with total displacement; (iii) quantitative features: these features are numerical description of the vehicle behavior, which represents the difference between the calculated average velocities based on total displacement, time, and the predicted average velocity. Le and Maple [8] suggested ML approaches to detect misbehavior in vehicular networks based on n-sequence trajectory inspection where a sequence of messages was considered to form a trajectory [11]. Three features were used to extract the data: (i) movement plausibility check: focus where the vehicle is moving but reported as uncharged, by observing a sequence of trajectories; (ii) minimum distance to trajectories: aims to find moving patterns of the vehicle in the legitimate set; and (iii) minimum translation to the trajectories.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They designed plausibility metrics with six features: (i) local plausibility check: sender's location is compared with a predicted plausible location and the distribution of average acceleration; (ii) movement plausibility check: this feature check the plausibility of the total displacement with the average velocity during the entire trip and compare with total displacement; (iii) quantitative features: these features are numerical description of the vehicle behavior, which represents the difference between the calculated average velocities based on total displacement, time, and the predicted average velocity. Le and Maple [8] suggested ML approaches to detect misbehavior in vehicular networks based on n-sequence trajectory inspection where a sequence of messages was considered to form a trajectory [11]. Three features were used to extract the data: (i) movement plausibility check: focus where the vehicle is moving but reported as uncharged, by observing a sequence of trajectories; (ii) minimum distance to trajectories: aims to find moving patterns of the vehicle in the legitimate set; and (iii) minimum translation to the trajectories.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, vehicular networks have benefited from the advances in machine learning in the areas of network security. Indeed, several ML-based Misbehavior Detection Systems (ML-based MDSs) have been proposed for the efficient detection of false position attacks [5][6][7][8][9][10]. However, existing solutions leverage numerous features which increase the computational complexity and overhead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le and Maple. [14] proposed a supervised learning approach to detect false position attacks. This approach compares the trajectory of vehicles with trajectories of legitimated vehicles.…”
Section: B Ml-based Misbehavior Detection Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, vehicular networks have benefited from the advances in machine learning in the areas of network security. Indeed, several ML-based Misbehavior Detection Systems (MLbased MDSs) have been proposed for the efficient detection of internal attackers [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. However, existing solutions have only been proposed to detect active attackers since detecting passive attacks is usually reported as impossible [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VANET [36]- [68] IoV [69]- [78] SDVN [37], [38], [53] [62], [70], [79] EEVN [57], [58], [80] VCC [48], [51] [53], [81] 5GVN [82] Fig. 3.…”
Section: Vehicular Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%