2016
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shake table investigation on the seismic performance of hospital equipment supported on wheels/casters

Abstract: Summary This paper presents an experimental investigation on the seismic response of medical equipment supported on wheels and/or casters. Two pieces of equipment were tested: a large ultrasound machine and a cart carrying smaller medical equipment. In the first phase, the resistance of the wheels and casters of the equipment was characterized through a controlled‐displacement procedure on the shake table. In the second phase, an extensive shake table test program was carried out to investigate the seismic res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A dimensionless acceleration intensity measure (IM) was used, along with an engineering demand parameter previously developed . Nikfar and Konstantinidis assessed on shake table the experimental response of hospital equipment supported on wheels/casters. Experimental observations were used to find the most appropriate structural engineering parameters correlated to the sample nonstructural components, namely relative displacement and velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dimensionless acceleration intensity measure (IM) was used, along with an engineering demand parameter previously developed . Nikfar and Konstantinidis assessed on shake table the experimental response of hospital equipment supported on wheels/casters. Experimental observations were used to find the most appropriate structural engineering parameters correlated to the sample nonstructural components, namely relative displacement and velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-block model was developed in (Kounadis et al, 2012) where the simplified assumption of no loss of energy during impacts for each body in the system was adopted. Other type of rocking systems have been presented for rocking frames in (Makris and Vassiliou, 2014;Dimitrakopoulos and Giouvanidis, 2015), for rocking bodies on base isolation in (Harvey Jr, 2017;Vassiliou and Makris, 2012), for rocking bodies with casters in (Chatzis and Smyth, 2012a;Nikfar and Konstantinidis, 2017) and for a statuepedestal system in (Wittich and Hutchinson, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a simple freestanding rocking block has been systematically studied for more than five decades both when the block is assumed rigid [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and when it assumed deformable [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Small scale experiments have been also performed [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. It has been proven that structures that rock inplane (2d rocking) have remarkable dynamic stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%