1965
DOI: 10.2307/40119943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shakespeare Our Contemporary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing visibility and internationalization of Australian literature as an academic field of study will over time introduce new critical perspectives that will surely enliven the subject, even if some curmudgeonly nativist scholars might continue to complain about how overseas readers tend to get things wrong. Such protectionist impulses are familiar enough, but there has of course been a long tradition of canonical English authors being re‐read in provocative and illuminating ways by non‐English scholars: Jan Kott on Shakespeare (Kott, 1965) and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick on Jane Austen (Sedgwick, 1991) come immediately to mind. In this sense, the various forms of critical displacement through which Australian literature and Australian literary scholarship will find themselves integrated more fully into a world system should ultimately be beneficial for all parties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing visibility and internationalization of Australian literature as an academic field of study will over time introduce new critical perspectives that will surely enliven the subject, even if some curmudgeonly nativist scholars might continue to complain about how overseas readers tend to get things wrong. Such protectionist impulses are familiar enough, but there has of course been a long tradition of canonical English authors being re‐read in provocative and illuminating ways by non‐English scholars: Jan Kott on Shakespeare (Kott, 1965) and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick on Jane Austen (Sedgwick, 1991) come immediately to mind. In this sense, the various forms of critical displacement through which Australian literature and Australian literary scholarship will find themselves integrated more fully into a world system should ultimately be beneficial for all parties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%