2005
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2005)131:5(610)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaking Table Modeling of Seismically Induced Deformations in Slopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
107
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wasowski et al (2011) provided a thorough review of previous, current, and future research studies pertaining to the topic of earthquake-induced landslides. In general, the analysis of dynamic responses and deformations in slopes can be performed by numerical integration (Newmark 1965;Wilson and Keefer 1983;Chang et al 2005), numerical simulation (Wakai et al 2009;Zhang et al 2012), and physical modeling (Wartman et al 2005;Wang and Lin 2011). Analysis of earthquake-induced landslides usually requires information about shearing resistance at the sliding plane of a slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wasowski et al (2011) provided a thorough review of previous, current, and future research studies pertaining to the topic of earthquake-induced landslides. In general, the analysis of dynamic responses and deformations in slopes can be performed by numerical integration (Newmark 1965;Wilson and Keefer 1983;Chang et al 2005), numerical simulation (Wakai et al 2009;Zhang et al 2012), and physical modeling (Wartman et al 2005;Wang and Lin 2011). Analysis of earthquake-induced landslides usually requires information about shearing resistance at the sliding plane of a slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason may be the limitations of small model text in laboratory under certain boundary condition. Solving (14) sliding displacement of model slope by pseudodynamic method is evaluated and compared with sliding displacement observed on model slope under shake table test. Table 7 shows the analytical and experimental Table 6: Critical angle and stability number of slope made up of soil + 10% saw dust.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of shake table tests were done by Koga and Matsuo [11] to see the response of earthen embankment founded on saturated sand under earthquake loading and they observed that slumps and cracks were formed due to softening of underlying ground. Recently Wartman et al [12][13][14] conducted small scale shake table 2 Advances in Materials Science and Engineering tests to study slope deformations during seismic condition and to assess the applicability of Newmark's sliding block method of analysis and observed largest deformation due to shaking being near the toe of slopes. A 0.5 m high 30 ∘ inclined sandy slope was analysed by Lin and Wang [15] and they observed that responses of slope became nonlinear after 0.5 g loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of this, a project was launched by the University of California at Berkeley [42], and six physical model slope experiments were conducted by Wartman [43]. The purpose of that project was (i) to investigate the mechanisms of seismically-induced permanent deformations in slopes and embankments, (ii) to assess the accuracy and applicability of the Newmark-type procedures for estimating deformations in slopes, and (iii) to develop a series of fully deÿned model-scale case histories for calibration of existing numerical procedures for predicting seismic slope deformations and for the future development of more advanced numerical analyses.…”
Section: Model Slope Experiments Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%