Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3369457.3369504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaking the Tree

Abstract: Gender equity is an issue of increasing importance in the technology industry generally and HCI specifically. Women are historically underrepresented at all levels, but moreso in senior roles; conversely visible senior women increase female participation generally. In this paper we present the first scientometric analysis of OzCHI examining the interaction between gender and role seniority, showing that overall female representation is quite good, but we need to be cautious to preserve it. This is the first an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have deferred the study of author order to later research, as this would itself produce extensive data and merit analysis in a separate work. Our focus on full papers is also motivated by the same previous work: men are known to be more strongly represented in full papers, and in senior organizational roles (see (Bogers & Greifeneder, 2016; McKay & Buchanan, 2019). Again, a comparison of contribution types would merit separate reporting, as we have done in human‐computer interaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have deferred the study of author order to later research, as this would itself produce extensive data and merit analysis in a separate work. Our focus on full papers is also motivated by the same previous work: men are known to be more strongly represented in full papers, and in senior organizational roles (see (Bogers & Greifeneder, 2016; McKay & Buchanan, 2019). Again, a comparison of contribution types would merit separate reporting, as we have done in human‐computer interaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manual checking of personal websites is time‐consuming, and precision could be maintained with the volumes involved. Recent works have taken similar timescales (McKay & Buchanan, 2019) or shorter periods such as two years (Bogers & Greifeneder, 2016). The earlier works that took longer timespans have used a sampling basis, e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the broader picture, "women in STEM [Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics] make $16,000 less on average than their male counterparts" [35]. To date, the only breakthroughs include one recent paper has been written about the role that gender plays in senior roles and publishing within HCI [32].…”
Section: Working Draft Copy Only Please Cite Final Version Final Version Published Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extant findings from these subfields explain the slight improvement in the male:female ratios. HCI has had issues regarding representation of women which are canvassed by McKay and Buchanan [32]. Via an analysis of OzCHI, the Australian HCI conference venue, these authors claim that "…female representation is quite good, but we need to be cautious to preserve it".…”
Section: Slight Improvement: Nlp Is Hcimentioning
confidence: 99%