Shale Gas Content Calculation of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Southeastern Ordos Basin, China

Abstract

Shale gas content is the key parameter for shale gas potential evaluation and favorable area prediction. Therefore, it is very important to determine shale gas content accurately. Generally, we use the US Bureau of Mines (USBM) method for coal reservoirs to calculate the gas content of shale reservoirs. However, shale reservoirs are different from coal reservoirs in depth, pressure, core collection, etc. This method would inevitably cause problems. In order to make the USBM method more suitable for shale reservoirs, an improved USBM method is put forward on the basis of systematic analysis of core pressure history and temperature history during shale gas degassing. The improved USBM method modifies the calculation method of the gas loss time, and determines the temperature balance time of water heating. In addition, we give the calculation method of adsorption gas content and free gas content, especially the new method of calculating the oil dissolved gas content and water dissolved gas content that are easily neglected. We used the direct method (USBM and the improved USBM) and the indirect method (including the calculation of adsorption gas, free gas and the dissolved gas method) to calculate the shale gas content of 16 shale samples of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Southeastern Ordos Basin, China. The results of the improved USBM method show that the total shale gas content is high, with an average of 3.97 m 3 /t, and the lost shale gas content is the largest proportion with an average of 62%. The total shale gas content calculated by the improved USBM method is greater than that of the USBM method. The results of the indirect method show that the total shale gas content is large, with an average of 4.11 m 3 /t, and the adsorption shale gas content is the largest proportion with an average of 71%. The oil dissolved shale gas content which should be paid attention to accounts for about 7.8%. The discrepancy between the direct method and indirect method is reduced by using the improved USBM method, and the improved USBM method could be more practical and accurate than the USBM method.

A Novel Static Correction Approach for Eliminating the Effect of Geophones—A Case Study in Coal Reservoirs, Ordos Basin, China

“…In recent years, many papers [17,32,[35][36][37][38][39] have been published about the Ordos Basin, China, and this area has become a hotspot. In this paper, field data are derived from the Daliuta Coal Mine (Figure 2) at Yulin city, Shanxi Province, China, which is located at 39 • 13 53"-39 • 21 32" N, 110 • 12 23"-110 • 22 54" E. The Daliuta Coal Mine lies in the north of the Loess Plateau and southeast of the Maowusu Desert, Ordos Basin, China.…”