Shale Gas Development and Community Distress: Evidence from England

Abstract

This research examines psychosocial stress associated with shale gas development through the narratives of residents and the Revised Impact of Event Scale (IES-R). We carried out our research in three of England’s communities impacted by shale gas development. To gather data, we conducted qualitative interviews and engaged in participant observation in all three communities and conducted a quantitative survey of residents. From our qualitative interviews it was apparent that the residents we spoke with experienced significant levels of stress associated with shale gas development in each community. Importantly, residents reported that stress was not only a reaction to development, but a consequence of interacting with industry and decision makers. Our quantitative findings suggest that a significant portion of residents 14.1% living near the shale gas sites reported high levels of stress (i.e., scoring 24 or more points) even while the mean IES-R score of residents living around the site is relatively low (i.e., 9.6; 95% CI 7.5–11.7). We conclude that the experiences, of the three English communities, reported in the qualitative interviews and quantitative survey are consistent with the reports of stress in the United States for those residents who live in shale gas communities. We therefore suggest that psychosocial stress is an important negative externality, which needs to be taken seriously by local planning officers and local planning committees when considering exploration and development permits for shale gas.

Fracking: Calling for an Effective Geo-Communication Strategy

“…It is hereby suggested that there can be a substantial benefit to the public from an efficient geo-communication that would seek to avoid conflating systemic risks of the current hydraulic fracturing model (regardless of the regulations/precautions) and the risks associated with poor regulations of the fracking facilities. Let us take a brief look at one example from both categories [5].…”

Fracking and Democracy in the United Kingdom

“…Hence, egalitarian impulses may often be mobilized against the effects of the state, as well as those of corporate players. On the ground of fracking developments in the UK, the experience of 'state capture' has made people feel disempowered, frustrated, distrustful, polarized, stressed, and ill (Aryee et al 2020;Szolucha 2021). However, the disillusion and mistrust that drove their resistance could also be redirected against their once and former allies, thus creating the conditions for the emergence of a darker side of egalitarian dynamics predicated on deep distrust.…”

Watching fracking

“…This perceived injustice can explain why the anti‐fracking communities in Lancashire experienced a form of collective trauma (Aryee et al. 2020; Short and Szolucha 2019) when the application for fracking at PNR was progressing through the planning process. Planning reinforced the understanding of shale gas development as a technological and legal issue that required specialist expertise.…”